• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别和量化常见系统观察工具在测量青少年身体活动方面的非预期变异性。

Identifying and Quantifying the Unintended Variability in Common Systematic Observation Instruments to Measure Youth Physical Activity.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2018 Sep 1;15(9):651-660. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0375. Epub 2018 May 10.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2017-0375
PMID:29742990
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct observation protocols may introduce variability in physical activity estimates.

METHODS

Thirty-five physical education lessons were video recorded and coded using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT). A multistep process examined variability in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA%; walking + vigorous/total scans). Initially, per-SOFIT protocol MVPA% (MVPA%SOFIT) estimates were produced for each lesson. Second, true MVPA% (mean MVPA% of all students using all observations, MVPA%true) estimates were calculated. Third, MVPA% (MVPA%perm) was calculated based on all permutations of students and observation order. Fourth, physical education lessons were divided into 2 groups with 5 lessons from each group randomly selected 10,000 times. Group MVPA%perm differences between the 10 selected lessons were compared with the MVPA%true difference between group 1 and group 2.

RESULTS

Across all lessons, 10,212,600 permutations were possible (average 291,789 combinations per lesson; range = 73,440-570,024). Across lessons, the average absolute difference between MVPA%true and MVPA%SOFIT estimates was ±4.8% (range = 0.1%-17.5%). Permutations, based on students selected and observation order, indicated that the mean range of MVPA%perm estimates was 41.6% within a lesson (range = 29.8%-55.9%). Differences in MVPA% estimates between the randomly selected groups of lessons varied by 32.0%.

CONCLUSION

MVPA% estimates from focal child observation should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

背景

直接观察方案可能会使身体活动估计值产生变异性。

方法

对 35 节体育课进行录像并使用体力活动教学观察时间系统(SOFIT)进行编码。采用多步骤流程,对中等到剧烈身体活动(MVPA%;行走+剧烈/总扫描)的变异性进行检查。首先,为每节课生成基于 SOFIT 方案的 MVPA%(MVPA%SOFIT)估计值。其次,计算真实 MVPA%(所有学生使用所有观察结果的平均 MVPA%,MVPA%true)估计值。然后,基于学生和观察顺序的所有排列,计算 MVPA%(MVPA%perm)。最后,将体育课分为两组,每组随机抽取 5 节课,进行 10000 次抽样。将 10 节选定课程之间的组 MVPA%perm 差异与组 1 和组 2 之间的 MVPA%true 差异进行比较。

结果

在所有课程中,可能有 10212600 种排列(平均每节课 291789 种组合;范围=73440-570024)。在所有课程中,MVPA%true 和 MVPA%SOFIT 估计值之间的平均绝对差异为±4.8%(范围=0.1%-17.5%)。基于选定学生和观察顺序的排列表明,一节课内 MVPA%perm 估计值的平均范围为 41.6%(范围=29.8%-55.9%)。随机选择的课程组之间的 MVPA%估计值差异为 32.0%。

结论

应谨慎解释来自重点儿童观察的 MVPA%估计值。

相似文献

1
Identifying and Quantifying the Unintended Variability in Common Systematic Observation Instruments to Measure Youth Physical Activity.识别和量化常见系统观察工具在测量青少年身体活动方面的非预期变异性。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Sep 1;15(9):651-660. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0375. Epub 2018 May 10.
2
Validation of an observation tool to assess physical activity-promoting physical education lessons in high schools: SOFIT.验证一种观察工具,以评估高中体育课中的促进身体活动的效果:SOFIT。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.186. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Physical education in secondary schools located in low-income communities: Physical activity levels, lesson context and teacher interaction.位于低收入社区的中学体育教育:身体活动水平、课程背景与教师互动
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Feb;19(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Physical education environment and student physical activity levels in low-income communities.贫困社区的体育教育环境与学生身体活动水平。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8278-8.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons.中学体育课中中等至剧烈身体活动水平的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0.
6
Quantifying physical activity via pedometry in elementary physical education.通过计步器在小学体育教育中对身体活动进行量化。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jun;35(6):1065-71. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069748.02525.B2.
7
Flipping the Script: An Initial Exploration of Flipped Learning as an Enhanced Alternative to Traditional Physical Education Lessons.翻转课堂:对翻转学习作为传统体育课程增强型替代方案的初步探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15188. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215188.
8
Physical activity in physical education: are longer lessons better?体育教育中的身体活动:课时更长会更好吗?
J Sch Health. 2015 Mar;85(3):141-8. doi: 10.1111/josh.12233.
9
'Physical education makes you fit and healthy'. Physical education's contribution to young people's physical activity levels.“体育教育让你身体健康”。体育教育对年轻人身体活动水平的贡献。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Feb;20(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg101. Epub 2004 Jul 14.
10
Levels of physical activity during physical education lessons in Sweden.瑞典体育课期间的身体活动水平。
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jan;106(1):135-141. doi: 10.1111/apa.13551. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated High-Frequency Observations of Physical Activity Using Computer Vision.利用计算机视觉进行高频体力活动自动观测。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Sep;52(9):2029-2036. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002341.
2
Physical education environment and student physical activity levels in low-income communities.贫困社区的体育教育环境与学生身体活动水平。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8278-8.