The University of Texas at Arlington , Arlington, Texas.
Institute for Exercise & Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital , Dallas, Texas.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Aug 1;125(2):529-535. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00304.2018. Epub 2018 May 10.
Cycle echocardiography (CE) is recommended for noninvasive diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction but can be limited by respiratory and movement artifact. Isometric handgrip echocardiography (IHE) is also a robust diastolic discriminator, while avoiding the limitations associated with dynamic exercise. This study sought to compare these two diastolic stress testing approaches. Twelve elderly individuals were recruited from the community (age 71 ± 6 yr). Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (via echocardiography) were assessed at rest and in response to 3 min of IHE at 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 3 min of CE at 20 W. Both IHE and CE caused a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure, leading to similar increases in myocardial oxygen demand. Both stressors also evoked a similar rise in the ratio between early LV mitral inflow velocity to early lateral annular velocity, a surrogate measure of LV filling pressure. The underlying mechanisms leading to these changes, however, were inherently different. IHE increased mean arterial pressure, and impaired myocardial relaxation, to a greater extent than CE. In contrast, CE augmented cardiac index, and increased early mitral filling velocity, to a great extent than IHE. In conclusion, for the first time, these data highlight several important similarities and differences between IHE and CE. That IHE avoids respiratory and movement artifact, while still serving as a robust diastolic discriminator, supports IHE as a strong alternative to CE for diastolic stress testing. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to compare the diastolic stress response between isometric handgrip exercise and conventional cycle exercise. The data suggest that isometric handgrip echocardiography is comparable to conventional cycle echocardiography, both in terms of its hemodynamic challenge and global diastolic stress response. That isometric handgrip echocardiography eliminates both respiratory and movement artifact and is low cost and incredibly portable supports its integration into routine echocardiography exams.
心动周期超声心动图(CE)是诊断舒张功能障碍的非侵入性方法,但可能受到呼吸和运动伪影的限制。等长握力超声心动图(IHE)也是一种强大的舒张区分器,同时避免了与动态运动相关的限制。本研究旨在比较这两种舒张应激测试方法。从社区招募了 12 名老年人(年龄 71±6 岁)。在休息时和以 40%最大自主收缩的 3 分钟 IHE 后,评估心率、动脉血压和左心室(LV)舒张功能(通过超声心动图),然后进行 3 分钟 20 W 的 CE。IHE 和 CE 均导致心率和血压显著升高,导致心肌需氧量相似增加。两种应激源也引起了早期 LV 二尖瓣流入速度与早期外侧环状速度之间的比值相似升高,这是 LV 充盈压的替代测量值。然而,导致这些变化的潜在机制本质上是不同的。与 CE 相比,IHE 更显著地增加平均动脉压并损害心肌松弛。相比之下,CE 极大地增加了心脏指数和早期二尖瓣充盈速度。总之,这些数据首次突出了 IHE 和 CE 之间的几个重要相似点和差异。IHE 避免了呼吸和运动伪影,同时仍然是一种强大的舒张区分器,支持 IHE 作为舒张应激测试的 CE 的强有力替代方案。新的和值得注意的是,这是第一项比较等长握力运动和常规循环运动之间舒张应激反应的研究。数据表明,等长握力超声心动图在其血流动力学挑战和整体舒张应激反应方面与常规循环超声心动图相当。等长握力超声心动图消除了呼吸和运动伪影,成本低廉且便携性极高,支持将其整合到常规超声心动图检查中。