Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Department of Critical Care Unit, Paris, France; Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France; Paris-Cardiovascular-Research-Center, INSERM U970, Paris, France.
Paris-Cardiovascular-Research-Center, INSERM U970, Paris, France.
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 8.
Little is known about the association between provision of post-resuscitation care and prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in elderly patients. Previous studies have suggested futility after 65 years of age.
We aimed to evaluate the association of early coronary angiogram (CAG) followed if necessary by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with favorable outcome after OHCA among elderly patients, compared to younger patients.
Using a large French registry, we included all OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm, transported to hospital from 2011 to 2015. Favorable outcome was defined as hospital discharge with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2. and were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age groups: <65, 65-75 and >75 years.
Among 1502 included patients, 31% were older than 65 and 12% older than 75 years. An early CAG was performed in 79%, 88% and 76% of patients below 65, between 65 and 75 and above 75, respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of patients discharged with CPC1 or 2 was 42% below 65, 38% between 65 and 75 and 24% above 75 (P < 0.001). Among the whole population, early CAG (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 3.9-10.5, P < 0.001) was associated with favorable outcome. In subgroups analysis, CAG was associated with favorable outcome among patients <65 and 65-75. In patients >75, there was a trend towards a favorable outcome (OR2.9, 95CI = 0.9-9.1).
In a large registry of OHCA survivors, the early CAG use was associated with a better prognosis. This benefit was persistent up to 75 years of age, suggesting that age alone should not guide the decision for early invasive strategy.
对于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)老年患者的复苏后护理与预后之间的关联,知之甚少。先前的研究表明,65 岁以上患者的复苏预后不佳。
我们旨在评估与年轻患者相比,早期冠状动脉造影(CAG)并在必要时进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对 OHCA 老年患者预后的影响。
我们使用法国的一个大型登记处,纳入了所有初始为可除颤节律、2011 年至 2015 年期间从医院转运而来的 OHCA 患者。预后良好定义为出院时的脑功能分类(CPC)为 1 或 2。通过多变量逻辑回归进行评估。根据年龄组进行亚组分析:<65 岁、65-75 岁和>75 岁。
在 1502 例纳入的患者中,31%的患者年龄大于 65 岁,12%的患者年龄大于 75 岁。<65 岁、65-75 岁和>75 岁的患者中,早期 CAG 的实施率分别为 79%、88%和 76%(P=0.002)。CPC1 或 2 出院的患者比例分别为<65 岁组为 42%、65-75 岁组为 38%、>75 岁组为 24%(P<0.001)。在整个人群中,早期 CAG(OR=6.4,95%CI=3.9-10.5,P<0.001)与良好预后相关。在亚组分析中,CAG 与<65 岁和 65-75 岁的患者的良好预后相关。对于>75 岁的患者,存在预后良好的趋势(OR=2.9,95CI=0.9-9.1)。
在一项大型 OHCA 幸存者登记研究中,早期 CAG 的使用与更好的预后相关。这一获益在 75 岁以下患者中持续存在,提示年龄本身不应指导早期侵入性策略的决策。