Sung Paul S
Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Motion Analysis Center, Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;57(4):742-746. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 May 7.
Understanding plantar pressure changes is an important component of the functional evaluation of subjects with flat foot. However, the altered postural control determined by the threshold from the vertical ground reaction force (GRF) requires clarification. The purpose of our study was to investigate the various GRF thresholds in subjects with and without flat foot during 1-leg standing. We included 34 control subjects and 30 subjects with flat foot in the present study. They performed the 1-leg standing test for 30 seconds, with the contralateral hip and knee flexed approximately 90°. The sensitivity of the various GRF thresholds (3, 7, 15, 50, and 100 N) for the postural stability index was analyzed with and without visual input. The standing times for the control and flat foot groups were 23.76 ± 4.42 and 21.78 ± 6.59 seconds, respectively, with no significant differences (t = 1.23; p = .22). The 2 groups demonstrated a significant interaction between the visual condition and the threshold levels (F = 11.40; p = .001). The postural stability index was significantly different in the eyes-open condition (0.95 ± 0.08 for the control group versus 0.84 ± 0.23 for the flat foot group; t = 2.29; p = .02). However, no difference was found in the eyes-closed condition (0.94 ± 0.10 for the control group versus 0.81 ± 0.30 for the flat foot group; t = 1.45; p = .15). These results indicate that GRF thresholds less than the 15N setting are sensitive to detect postural stability between groups, especially in the eyes-open condition. The GRF threshold setting, in addition to the visual condition, could alter the outcomes of sensitive plantar pressure changes in subjects with flat foot.
了解足底压力变化是扁平足受试者功能评估的重要组成部分。然而,由垂直地面反作用力(GRF)阈值所决定的姿势控制改变尚需阐明。我们研究的目的是调查扁平足和非扁平足受试者在单腿站立期间的各种GRF阈值。本研究纳入了34名对照受试者和30名扁平足受试者。他们进行了30秒的单腿站立测试,对侧髋部和膝部屈曲约90°。分析了有无视觉输入时各种GRF阈值(3、7、15、50和100 N)对姿势稳定性指数的敏感性。对照组和扁平足组的站立时间分别为23.76±4.42秒和21.78±6.59秒,无显著差异(t = 1.23;p = 0.22)。两组在视觉条件和阈值水平之间表现出显著的交互作用(F = 11.40;p = 0.001)。在睁眼条件下,姿势稳定性指数有显著差异(对照组为0.95±0.08,扁平足组为0.84±0.23;t = 2.29;p = 0.02)。然而,在闭眼条件下未发现差异(对照组为0.94±0.10,扁平足组为0.81±0.30;t = 1.45;p = 0.15)。这些结果表明,小于15N设定值的GRF阈值对于检测组间姿势稳定性很敏感,尤其是在睁眼条件下。除视觉条件外,GRF阈值设定可能会改变扁平足受试者敏感的足底压力变化结果。