International Health Management Associates, Inc., 2122 Palmer Drive, Schaumburg, IL, 60173, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Aug;37(8):1481-1489. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3274-y. Epub 2018 May 12.
Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae has been increasing globally especially due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBLs), which typically necessitate the use of carbapenems for treatment of serious infections. Emerging carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae further complicate therapy. As part of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), this analysis examined the recent activity of a key carbapenem (ertapenem) and other important therapeutic options against Enterobacteriaceae. From 2012 to 2016, 224 hospitals in 57 countries collected up to 100 consecutive gram-negative bacilli from intra-abdominal (IAI) and 50 from urinary tract infections (UTI) per year, totaling 106,300 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Susceptibility was determined using CLSI broth microdilution and breakpoints. Although statistically significant decreasing trends in ertapenem activity against Enterobacteriaceae were found in all regions except Middle East, the actual size of the decreases was < 3 percentage points, and susceptibility in 2015-2016 remained ca. 90% or higher, ranging from 89.5% in Asia to 97.3% in US/Canada. Of the comparators, only amikacin exceeded these results. Ertapenem was active against > 90% of isolates with ESBL phenotype from Latin America, Middle East, South Pacific, and US/Canada, and against > 80% of MDR isolates in all regions except Africa (72.9%), Asia (75.1%), and Europe (78.0%). Only imipenem, amikacin, and colistin exceeded these rates. Ertapenem, which is popular among clinicians due to its convenient once-daily dosing schedule and favorable safety and tolerability profile, remains highly active against Enterobacteriaceae from IAI and UTI, even as ESBLs and other resistance mechanisms limit therapeutic options, but continued susceptibility testing for surveillance and individual patients is important.
肠杆菌科的抗菌药物耐药性在全球范围内不断增加,尤其是由于超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的存在,这些酶通常需要使用碳青霉烯类药物来治疗严重感染。新出现的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌进一步使治疗复杂化。作为监测抗菌药物耐药趋势研究(SMART)的一部分,本分析检查了一种关键碳青霉烯类药物(厄他培南)和其他针对肠杆菌科的重要治疗选择的近期活性。在 2012 年至 2016 年期间,来自 57 个国家的 224 家医院每年从腹腔内(IAI)感染和 50 例尿路感染(UTI)中收集了多达 100 株连续的革兰氏阴性杆菌,总计收集了 106300 株肠杆菌科分离株。使用 CLSI 肉汤微量稀释法和折点确定了药敏性。尽管除中东地区外,所有地区的厄他培南对肠杆菌科的活性都呈现出统计学上显著的下降趋势,但实际下降幅度小于 3 个百分点,并且 2015-2016 年的药敏性仍保持在约 90%或更高水平,范围从亚洲的 89.5%到美国/加拿大的 97.3%。在比较药物中,只有阿米卡星超过了这些结果。厄他培南对拉丁美洲、中东、南太平洋和美国/加拿大的 ESBL 表型分离株的活性超过 90%,对除非洲(72.9%)、亚洲(75.1%)和欧洲(78.0%)以外所有地区的 MDR 分离株的活性超过 80%。只有亚胺培南、阿米卡星和粘菌素的活性超过了这些比率。厄他培南由于其方便的每日一次给药方案以及良好的安全性和耐受性,深受临床医生的欢迎,它对腹腔内和尿路感染的肠杆菌科细菌仍然具有高度活性,即使 ESBLs 和其他耐药机制限制了治疗选择,但继续进行药敏试验以进行监测和个别患者的治疗仍然很重要。