Suppr超能文献

针捕集微萃取和固相微萃取的评估:获取关于体外培养物挥发性排放的全面信息。

Evaluation of needle trap micro-extraction and solid-phase micro-extraction: Obtaining comprehensive information on volatile emissions from in vitro cultures.

作者信息

Oertel Peter, Bergmann Andreas, Fischer Sina, Trefz Phillip, Küntzel Anne, Reinhold Petra, Köhler Heike, Schubert Jochen K, Miekisch Wolfram

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rostock Medical Breath Research Analytics and Technologies, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis at the 'Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut', Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Biomed Chromatogr. 2018 Oct;32(10):e4285. doi: 10.1002/bmc.4285. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from in vitro cultures may reveal information on species and metabolism. Owing to low nmol L concentration ranges, pre-concentration techniques are required for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) based analyses. This study was intended to compare the efficiency of established micro-extraction techniques - solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) and needle-trap micro-extraction (NTME) - for the analysis of complex VOC patterns. For SPME, a 75 μm Carboxen®/polydimethylsiloxane fiber was used. The NTME needle was packed with divinylbenzene, Carbopack X and Carboxen 1000. The headspace was sampled bi-directionally. Seventy-two VOCs were calibrated by reference standard mixtures in the range of 0.041-62.24 nmol L by means of GC-MS. Both pre-concentration methods were applied to profile VOCs from cultures of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis. Limits of detection ranged from 0.004 to 3.93 nmol L (median = 0.030 nmol L ) for NTME and from 0.001 to 5.684 nmol L (median = 0.043 nmol L ) for SPME. NTME showed advantages in assessing polar compounds such as alcohols. SPME showed advantages in reproducibility but disadvantages in sensitivity for N-containing compounds. Micro-extraction techniques such as SPME and NTME are well suited for trace VOC profiling over cultures if the limitations of each technique is taken into account.

摘要

体外培养物释放的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)可能揭示有关物种和代谢的信息。由于其浓度范围在纳摩尔每升的低水平,基于气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)的分析需要预浓缩技术。本研究旨在比较成熟的微萃取技术——固相微萃取(SPME)和针阱微萃取(NTME)——在分析复杂VOC模式方面的效率。对于SPME,使用了一根75μm的Carboxen®/聚二甲基硅氧烷纤维。NTME针填充有二乙烯基苯、Carbopack X和Carboxen 1000。顶空采用双向采样。通过GC - MS,用参考标准混合物在0.041 - 62.24 nmol/L范围内对72种VOC进行了校准。两种预浓缩方法都应用于分析鸟分枝杆菌副结核亚种培养物中的VOC。NTME的检测限范围为0.004至3.93 nmol/L(中位数 = 0.030 nmol/L),SPME的检测限范围为0.001至5.684 nmol/L(中位数 = 0.043 nmol/L)。NTME在评估极性化合物(如醇类)方面具有优势。SPME在重现性方面具有优势,但在检测含氮化合物时灵敏度较低。如果考虑到每种技术的局限性,诸如SPME和NTME之类的微萃取技术非常适合对培养物中的痕量VOC进行分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验