Ferman Mutaz, Lim Amanda H, Hossain Monowar, Siow Glenn W, Andrews Jane M
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gastroenterology Unit, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2018 Sep;48(9):1102-1108. doi: 10.1111/imj.13965.
Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) have proven efficacy in cancer management. Whilst widely implemented in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care, their value is yet to be investigated. We reviewed the performance of MDTM for IBD patients.
Retrospective review of MDTM from March 2013 to July 2016. Each patient's first MDTM was considered. Data collected included: report production and location, disease factors, recommendation(s), implementation and barriers to implementation. The MDTM process was considered successful when at least top-level recommendations were implemented within 6 months.
MDTM attendance included an IBD gastroenterologist, surgeons, a radiologist, nurses, dieticians, psychologists and clinical trial staff. Initial MDTM encounters of 166 patients were reviewed: 86 females, mean age 40 years, 140 (84.3%) with Crohn disease and mean disease duration of 10.8 years (interquartile range 15 years). Electronic reports were filed for all patients, with hard copies in 84%. In 151 of 166 episodes, all (n = 127) or top-line (n = 24) recommendations were implemented, although there was a delay beyond 6 months in 5. Of 146 patients with a successful MDTM, 85 (58.2%) were in clinical remission at last review (median follow up: 27 months). Amongst patients with unsuccessful MDTM (n = 13), only two (15.4%) were in clinical remission at follow up. Barriers to implementation included patients declining recommendations and loss to follow up.
The majority of MDTM encounters were successful from both a process and clinical outcome perspective. System opportunities to improve the process include ensuring that 100% of reports are available and addressing implementation delays. Patient factors that require addressing include improved engagement and understanding reasons for declining recommendations.
多学科团队会议(MDTM)在癌症管理中已被证明具有疗效。虽然在炎症性肠病(IBD)护理中广泛实施,但其价值仍有待研究。我们回顾了MDTM在IBD患者中的表现。
对2013年3月至2016年7月的MDTM进行回顾性分析。考虑每位患者的首次MDTM。收集的数据包括:报告生成与地点、疾病因素、建议、实施情况及实施障碍。当至少顶级建议在6个月内得到实施时,MDTM过程被认为是成功的。
参加MDTM的人员包括IBD胃肠病学家、外科医生、放射科医生、护士、营养师、心理学家和临床试验人员。对166例患者的首次MDTM会诊进行了回顾:86名女性,平均年龄40岁,140例(84.3%)患有克罗恩病,平均病程10.8年(四分位间距15年)。所有患者均提交了电子报告,84%有纸质副本。在166次会诊中的151次中,所有(n = 127)或顶级(n = 24)建议均得到实施,尽管5次出现了超过6个月的延迟。在146例MDTM成功的患者中,85例(58.2%)在最后一次复查时处于临床缓解状态(中位随访时间:27个月)。在MDTM不成功的患者(n = 13)中,随访时只有2例(15.4%)处于临床缓解状态。实施障碍包括患者拒绝建议和失访。
从过程和临床结果的角度来看,大多数MDTM会诊是成功的。改进过程的系统机会包括确保100%的报告可用并解决实施延迟问题。需要解决的患者因素包括提高参与度和理解拒绝建议的原因。