Anderson Lisa C
Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Jun 1;42(2):348-353. doi: 10.1152/advan.00118.2017.
Retrieval practice, a deep-learning technique in which the learner attempts to recall a concept of interest from memory, has been shown to be more effective than surface-learning techniques, such as rereading a textbook. Accordingly, textbook publishers are developing supplemental resources that are purported to improve student learning outcomes by encouraging deep learning and critical thinking. The purpose of this study is to 1) survey students in a physiology course about their use of multiple course resources; and 2) assess the effect of self-reported engagement in course resources on learning outcomes, as assessed by comparing course grades. Students who had completed an undergraduate physiology course were sent an online survey about their course experience; two reminders were e-mailed. Students were asked to report their physiology course grade, satisfaction with how much they had learned, which resources they had used, and how they had completed course assignments (critical thinking exercises and online quizzes), i.e., whether they had 1) looked up answers online, 2) looked up answers in the textbook, 3) tried to figure out the answers before using the textbook, or 4) only used their recall. Categories 1 and 2 were considered nonretrieval strategies, and categories 3 and 4 were considered retrieval strategies. There was no association with the type of resource students used and course grade or course satisfaction. Students who practiced retrieval strategies achieved significantly higher course grades than students who did not for both critical thinking exercises and online quizzes.
检索练习是一种深度学习技术,学习者试图从记忆中回忆感兴趣的概念,研究表明它比诸如重读教科书等表面学习技术更有效。因此,教科书出版商正在开发补充资源,据称这些资源通过鼓励深度学习和批判性思维来提高学生的学习成果。本研究的目的是:1)对生理学课程的学生使用多种课程资源的情况进行调查;2)通过比较课程成绩来评估自我报告的对课程资源的参与程度对学习成果的影响。已完成本科生理学课程的学生收到了一份关于他们课程体验的在线调查问卷;并通过电子邮件发送了两次提醒。学生们被要求报告他们的生理学课程成绩、对所学知识量的满意度、使用了哪些资源以及他们完成课程作业(批判性思维练习和在线测验)的方式,即他们是1)在网上查找答案,2)在教科书中查找答案,3)在使用教科书之前尝试自己找出答案,还是4)仅依靠回忆。第1类和第2类被视为非检索策略,第3类和第4类被视为检索策略。学生使用的资源类型与课程成绩或课程满意度之间没有关联。在批判性思维练习和在线测验中,采用检索策略的学生的课程成绩显著高于未采用检索策略的学生。