Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beirut Arab University , Beirut , Lebanon.
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut , Beirut , Lebanon.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2018 Sep 1;315(3):F572-F582. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00275.2017. Epub 2018 May 16.
Nephrotoxicity is a serious side effect for the immunosuppressant drug cyclosporine A(CSA). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that administration of calcium channel blockers such as verapamil or nifedipine ameliorates renal CSA-induced renal dysfunction. Furthermore, our study investigates the roles of inflammatory, oxidative, and fibrotic pathways in CSA-induced renal dysfunction. Six groups of male rats ( n = 6/group) were used and received one of the following treatments for seven consecutive days: vehicle (Cremophor EL ip), CSA (25 mg·kg·day ip), verapamil (2 mg·kg·day ip), nifedipine (3 mg·kg·day ip), CSA in the presence or absence of either verapamil, or nifedipine. Biochemical and histomorphometric analyses showed that rats treated with CSA exhibited clear signs of nephrotoxicity that included 1) proteinuria and elevations in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, 2) mesangial expansion, 3) increases in glomerular and tubular type IV collagen expression, and 4) increases in the glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis indices. Although the single administration of nifedipine or verapamil had no significant effect on renal pathology, or its biochemical and physiological function, the concurrent use of either calcium channel blockers significantly and equipotently ameliorated the biochemical, morphological, and functional derangements caused by CSA. More importantly, we report that the oxidative (reactive oxygen species production, NADPH-oxidase activity, and dual oxidase 1/2 levels), fibrotic (transforming growth factor-β1 expression), and inflammatory (NF-κB expression) manifestations of renal toxicity induced by CSA were significantly reversed upon administration of nifedipine or verapamil. Together, these results highlight the efficacy of calcium channel-blocking agents in attenuating CSA-induced nephrotoxicity and predisposing biochemical and molecular machineries.
肾毒性是免疫抑制剂环孢素 A(CSA)的一种严重副作用。在这项研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即钙通道阻滞剂如维拉帕米或硝苯地平的给药可以改善 CSA 引起的肾功能障碍。此外,我们的研究还探讨了炎症、氧化和纤维化途径在 CSA 诱导的肾功能障碍中的作用。六组雄性大鼠(n = 6/组)连续七天接受以下一种治疗:载体(Cremophor EL ip)、CSA(25 mg·kg·day ip)、维拉帕米(2 mg·kg·day ip)、硝苯地平(3 mg·kg·day ip)、CSA 加或不加维拉帕米或硝苯地平。生化和组织形态计量学分析表明,用 CSA 处理的大鼠表现出明显的肾毒性迹象,包括 1)蛋白尿和血清肌酐和血尿素氮升高,2)系膜扩张,3)肾小球和肾小管 IV 型胶原表达增加,4)肾小球硬化和肾小管间质纤维化指数增加。尽管硝苯地平或维拉帕米的单次给药对肾脏病理或其生化和生理功能没有显著影响,但同时使用钙通道阻滞剂可显著和等效地改善 CSA 引起的生化、形态和功能紊乱。更重要的是,我们报告称,CSA 引起的氧化(活性氧产生、NADPH 氧化酶活性和双氧化酶 1/2 水平)、纤维化(转化生长因子-β1 表达)和炎症(NF-κB 表达)表现均被硝苯地平或维拉帕米给药显著逆转。综上所述,这些结果强调了钙通道阻断剂在减轻 CSA 诱导的肾毒性和易化生化和分子机制方面的功效。