Suppr超能文献

微型种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿的两步即刻加载:一项前瞻性临床研究。

Two-Step Immediate Loading of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Mini-implants: A Prospective Clinical Study.

作者信息

Park Jin-Hong, Shin Sang-Wan, Lee Jeong-Yol

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2018 September/October;31(5):446–450. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5776. Epub 2018 May 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes of mandibular overdentures retained by two different mini-implant systems with ball attachments under a two-step immediate loading protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This clinical trial investigated treatment outcomes of mandibular mini-implant overdentures in 45 edentulous patients. MDI implants (3M ESPE) and SlimLine implants (Dentium) were randomly selected for placement in the anterior mandible in each group (MDI = 21; SlimLine = 24) with a flapless surgical approach. The side of the tissue in the region of the complete mandibular denture where mini-implants were placed was immediately relined with soft reliner (COE-SOFT). The female components were attached on the dentures 2 months after implant placement. Clinical and radiographic data were collected during follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (α = .05).

RESULTS

A total of 177 mini-implants were inserted in the anterior mandibles of 45 totally edentulous patients. There were five implant failures (97.2% success rate) and no significant differences between the two implant groups. Most mini-implants showed stable initial Periotest values (a mean ± standard deviation of 1.03 ± 3.65 mm) and a mean marginal bone loss of 0.50 ± 0.75 mm at 12 months. Multiple regression analysis revealed that implants ≤ 2.4 mm in diameter had higher Periotest values than those ≥ 2.8 mm. Intial Periotest values significantly influenced implant failure (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in treatment outcomes between patients treated with MDI or SlimLine implants. Mini-implants with wider diameters showed higher initial stability than those with narrow diameters, which may influence implant survival.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在两步即刻负重方案下,两种不同带球附着体的微型种植体系统固位的下颌覆盖义齿的治疗效果。

材料与方法

本临床试验调查了45例无牙患者下颌微型种植体覆盖义齿的治疗效果。将MDI种植体(3M ESPE)和SlimLine种植体(登腾)随机分组,每组采用不翻瓣手术在前下颌植入(MDI组 = 21例;SlimLine组 = 24例)。在下颌全口义齿放置微型种植体区域的组织侧立即用软衬材料(COE - SOFT)重衬。种植体植入2个月后在义齿上安装阴型部件。随访期间收集临床和影像学数据。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

45例全口无牙患者的前下颌共植入177枚微型种植体。有5枚种植体失败(成功率97.2%)且两组种植体之间无显著差异。大多数微型种植体最初的Periotest值稳定(平均±标准差为1.03±3.65 mm),12个月时平均边缘骨吸收为0.50±0.75 mm。多元回归分析显示,直径≤2.4 mm的种植体比直径≥2.8 mm的种植体具有更高的Periotest值。初始Periotest值显著影响种植体失败(P < 0.05)。

结论

使用MDI或SlimLine种植体治疗的患者在治疗效果上无显著差异。直径较宽的微型种植体比直径较窄的微型种植体显示出更高的初始稳定性,这可能影响种植体的存留。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验