Than Christian, Seidl Laura, Tosovic Danijel, Brown J Mark
The University of Queensland, School of Biomedical Sciences, St. Lucia 4072, Australia.
The University of Queensland, School of Biomedical Sciences, St. Lucia 4072, Australia.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Aug;41:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 12.
This study investigated test-retest reliability of mechanomyography (MMG) on lumbar paraspinal muscles. Healthy male and female subjects (mean ± standard deviation, 25 ± 9.4 years, BMI 21.8 ± 2.99, n = 34) were recruited. Two test sessions (one week apart) consisted of MMG (laser displacement sensor (LDS)) muscle evaluations over the 10 lumbar facet joints, and 2 bilateral sacral sites, in anatomical extension and flexion. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc showed no significant differences between testing sessions for the same position (p > 0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) in extension were classified as 'very good' (0.8-0.9) for maximal muscle displacement (Dmax), contraction time (Tc) and velocity of contraction (Vr). Half relaxation time (½Tr) and half relaxation velocity (½Vr) were 'poor' (0.4-0.5) and 'good' (0.7-0.8). In flexion, Dmax, Tc and Vr were 'excellent' (≥0.9) whilst ½Tr and ½Vr were 'fair' (0.6-0.7) and 'very good'. Comparing extension against flexion, significant (p < 0.05) differences in Dmax and ½Vr were found (L1/L2-L5/S1). Tc was significant (p < 0.05) for all sites whilst Vc was for L1/L2 on both sides (p < 0.05). ½Tr showed no significance (p > 0.05). Most MMG-derived parameters thus appear as reliable measures of muscle contractile properties in lumbar extension and flexion, with flexion providing more reliable results (ICCs).
本研究调查了腰椎旁肌肉肌动图(MMG)的重测信度。招募了健康男性和女性受试者(平均±标准差,25±9.4岁,体重指数21.8±2.99,n = 34)。两个测试阶段(间隔一周)包括在解剖学伸展和屈曲状态下,对10个腰椎小关节以及2个双侧骶骨部位进行MMG(激光位移传感器(LDS))肌肉评估。采用双向重复测量方差分析和Tukey事后检验,结果显示相同体位的测试阶段之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。伸展状态下,最大肌肉位移(Dmax)、收缩时间(Tc)和收缩速度(Vr)的组内相关系数(ICC)被归类为“非常好”(0.8 - 0.9)。半松弛时间(½Tr)和半松弛速度(½Vr)分别为“差”(0.4 - 0.5)和“好”(0.7 - 0.8)。在屈曲状态下,Dmax、Tc和Vr为“优秀”(≥0.9),而½Tr和½Vr分别为“中等”(0.6 - 0.7)和“非常好”。比较伸展和屈曲状态,发现Dmax和½Vr存在显著(p<0.05)差异(L1/L2 - L5/S1)。所有部位的Tc均具有显著性(p<0.05),而两侧L1/L2的Vc具有显著性(p<0.05)。½Tr无显著性(p>0.05)。因此,大多数MMG衍生参数似乎是腰椎伸展和屈曲时肌肉收缩特性的可靠测量指标,屈曲状态下提供更可靠的结果(ICC)。