Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
Histochem Cell Biol. 2018 Aug;150(2):107-118. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1678-5. Epub 2018 May 17.
This article aims at providing an update on the complexity of clathrin-independent endocytosis. It is now almost 30 years since we first wrote a review about its existence; at that time many people believed that with the exception of macropinocytosis, which will only be briefly mentioned in this review, all uptake could be accounted for by clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Now it is generally accepted that there are different clathrin-independent mechanisms, some of them regulated by ligands and membrane lipid composition. They can be both dynamin-dependent and -independent, meaning that the uptake cannot be accounted for by caveolae and other dynamin-dependent processes such as tubular structures that can be induced by toxins, e.g. Shiga toxin, or the fast endophilin mediated endocytosis recently described. Caveolae seem to be mostly quite stable structures with other functions than endocytosis, but evidence suggests that they may have cell-type dependent functions. Although several groups have been working on endocytic mechanisms for years, and new advanced methods have improved our ability to study mechanistic details, there are still a number of important questions we need to address, such as: How many endocytic mechanisms does a cell have? How quantitatively important are they? What about the complexity in polarized cells where clathrin-independent endocytosis is differentially regulated on the apical and basolateral poles? These questions are not easy to answer since one and the same molecule may contribute to more than one process, and manipulating one mechanism can affect another. Also, several inhibitors of endocytic processes commonly used turn out to be less specific than originally thought. We will here describe the current view of clathrin-independent endocytic processes and the challenges in studying them.
本文旨在介绍网格蛋白非依赖型内吞作用的复杂性。自我们首次撰写关于其存在的综述以来,已经过去了近 30 年;当时,许多人认为,除了巨胞饮作用(本文将简要提及)之外,所有的摄取都可以用网格蛋白依赖型内吞作用来解释。现在人们普遍认为存在不同的网格蛋白非依赖型机制,其中一些受配体和膜脂质组成的调节。它们可以是依赖于或不依赖于动力蛋白的,这意味着摄取不能归因于小窝和其他依赖于动力蛋白的过程,如毒素诱导的管状结构(如志贺毒素)或最近描述的快速内吞素介导的内吞作用。小窝似乎是比内吞作用具有更多功能的相对稳定的结构,但有证据表明,它们可能具有细胞类型依赖性的功能。尽管一些研究小组多年来一直在研究内吞作用机制,并且新的先进方法提高了我们研究机制细节的能力,但仍有一些重要问题需要解决,例如:一个细胞有多少种内吞作用机制?它们的重要性有多大?在极化细胞中,网格蛋白非依赖型内吞作用在顶端和基底外侧极上的差异调节的复杂性如何?这些问题不容易回答,因为一个分子可能参与不止一个过程,而且操纵一个机制可能会影响另一个机制。此外,几种常用的内吞作用过程抑制剂的特异性比最初认为的要差。我们将在这里描述当前对网格蛋白非依赖型内吞作用过程的看法以及研究这些过程所面临的挑战。