Jayasinghe Samantha A, Srinivasa Ravi N, Hage Anthony N, Gemmete Joseph J, Majdalany Bill S, Chick Jeffrey Forris Beecham
School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX.
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;52:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 May 19.
Thoracic duct embolization (TDE) has become the standard treatment for atraumatic and traumatic chylothoraces. Numerous approaches to embolization including intranodal lymphangiography, transabdominal, and retrograde catheterization of the thoracic duct have become the preferred methods for the treatment of chyle leaks. The purpose of this study was to determine training, treatment techniques, outcomes, and practice patterns of practitioners performing TDE.
From September to October of 2017, a 34-question survey focusing on training, treatment techniques, outcomes, and practice patterns of TDE was distributed through the Open Forum of the Society of Interventional Radiology Connect website. Fifty-four practitioners completed the entire survey. Percentages were calculated for answers to the questions. Chi-squared analysis was performed, comparing data from academic center respondents, private practice settings, and hybrid practice settings. P values < 0.5 were considered statistically significant.
All responses were from interventional radiologists. Forty-seven practitioners (87.0%) performed TDE in the United States, and 1 performed (1.9%) abroad; 6 practitioners (11.1%) did not perform TDE. Of all, 88.9% (n = 48) performed TDE in academic (n = 24; 50%), private (n = 17; 35.4%), or hybrid (n = 6; 12.5%) practice settings. For diagnostic lymphangiography, 100% (n = 48) performed intranodal pelvic lymphangiography. A 25-gauge needle was used by 77.1% (n = 37) to access pelvic lymph nodes, and most (83.3%; n = 40) reported using manual hand injection to administer ethiodized oil. Nine of 24 (37.5%) respondents in academic practice and 15 of 23 (65.2%) in private practice were successful in cannulating the thoracic duct >80% of the time. Most referrals were from thoracic surgery (n = 47; 97.9%).
TDE is performed by practitioners in both academic and private practice settings. Treatment techniques were similar for a majority of operators. Technical success rates were higher in private practice. Most referrals were from thoracic surgery.
胸导管栓塞术(TDE)已成为非创伤性和创伤性乳糜胸的标准治疗方法。包括结内淋巴管造影、经腹以及胸导管逆行插管在内的多种栓塞方法已成为治疗乳糜漏的首选方法。本研究的目的是确定实施TDE的从业者的培训情况、治疗技术、治疗效果及实践模式。
2017年9月至10月,通过介入放射学会Connect网站的开放论坛分发了一份包含34个问题的调查问卷,内容聚焦于TDE的培训、治疗技术、治疗效果及实践模式。54名从业者完成了全部调查。计算了各问题答案的百分比。进行了卡方分析,比较了学术中心受访者、私人执业机构和混合执业机构的数据。P值<0.5被认为具有统计学意义。
所有回复均来自介入放射科医生。47名从业者(87.0%)在美国进行TDE,1名(1.9%)在国外进行;6名从业者(11.1%)未进行TDE。其中,88.9%(n = 48)在学术机构(n = 24;50%)、私人机构(n = 17;35.4%)或混合机构(n = 6;12.5%)进行TDE。对于诊断性淋巴管造影,100%(n = 48)进行结内盆腔淋巴管造影。77.1%(n = 37)使用25号针穿刺盆腔淋巴结,大多数(83.3%;n = 40)报告使用手动注射法注入乙碘油。学术机构的24名受访者中有9名(37.5%)、私人机构的23名受访者中有15名(65.2%)在超过80%的时间内成功插管胸导管。大多数转诊来自胸外科(n = 47;97.9%)。
学术机构和私人执业机构的从业者均实施TDE。大多数操作者的治疗技术相似。私人执业机构的技术成功率更高。大多数转诊来自胸外科。