文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

采用李克特量表数据的团队多样性测量方法的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.

作者信息

Deng Lifang, Marcoulides George A, Yuan Ke-Hai

机构信息

Beihang University, Beijing, China.

University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):512-534. doi: 10.1177/0013164414541275. Epub 2014 Jul 4.


DOI:10.1177/0013164414541275
PMID:29795831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5965639/
Abstract

Certain diversity among team members is beneficial to the growth of an organization. Multiple measures have been proposed to quantify diversity, although little is known about their psychometric properties. This article proposes several methods to evaluate the unidimensionality and reliability of three measures of diversity. To approximate the interval scale required by the measures of diversity, a transformation on the Likert-item scores is proposed. Ridge maximum likelihood is used to deal with the issue of small sample size, and methods for evaluating the significance of the difference of two reliability estimates with correlated samples are also developed. Results with a real data set on entrepreneurial teams indicate that different measures of diversity may correspond to significantly different estimates of reliability. Results also indicate that diversity measures obtained with the transformed data tend to be more unidimensional than their counterparts obtained from Likert data. However, diversity measures obtained from Likert data tend to yield greater reliability estimates. Among the three examined measures of diversity, the standard deviation is found to yield greater and more efficient reliability estimates than the others and is thus recommended.

摘要

团队成员之间的某种多样性有利于组织的发展。虽然人们对多种量化多样性的方法的心理测量特性知之甚少,但已经提出了多种措施来量化多样性。本文提出了几种方法来评估三种多样性测量方法的单维性和可靠性。为了近似多样性测量所需的区间尺度,提出了对李克特量表项目得分的转换。岭极大似然法用于处理小样本量问题,还开发了评估相关样本两个可靠性估计值差异显著性的方法。一个关于创业团队的真实数据集的结果表明,不同的多样性测量方法可能对应于显著不同的可靠性估计值。结果还表明,通过转换后的数据获得的多样性测量方法往往比从李克特数据获得的对应方法更具单维性。然而,从李克特数据获得的多样性测量方法往往会产生更高的可靠性估计值。在三种被检验的多样性测量方法中,发现标准差比其他方法能产生更高且更有效的可靠性估计值,因此推荐使用。

相似文献

[1]
Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.

Educ Psychol Meas. 2015-6

[2]
Three Mahalanobis distances and their role in assessing unidimensionality.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004-5

[3]
Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.

Med Care. 2003-5

[4]
An External Validity Approach for Assessing Essential Unidimensionality in Correlated-Factor Models.

Educ Psychol Meas. 2019-6

[5]
A unified approach to multi-item reliability.

Biometrics. 2010-12

[6]
Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale).

BMC Psychol. 2016-2-10

[7]
What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?

Value Health. 2007

[8]
Improving Likert scale big data analysis in psychometric health economics: reliability of the new compositional data approach.

Brain Inform. 2024-7-10

[9]
The Chinese Parental Stress Scale: psychometric evidence using Rasch modeling on clinical and nonclinical samples.

J Pers Assess. 2010-1

[10]
On the lack of comonotonicity between likert scores and Rasch-based measures.

J Appl Meas. 2005

引用本文的文献

[1]
Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.

Educ Psychol Meas. 2017-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components.

Multivariate Behav Res. 1997-10-1

[2]
Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics.

Multivariate Behav Res. 1999-4-1

[3]
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Psychol Bull. 1979-3

[4]
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.

J Appl Psychol. 2004-12

[5]
Indexing systematic rater agreement with a latent-class model.

Psychol Methods. 2002-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索