Suppr超能文献

采用李克特量表数据的团队多样性测量方法的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.

作者信息

Deng Lifang, Marcoulides George A, Yuan Ke-Hai

机构信息

Beihang University, Beijing, China.

University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):512-534. doi: 10.1177/0013164414541275. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

Abstract

Certain diversity among team members is beneficial to the growth of an organization. Multiple measures have been proposed to quantify diversity, although little is known about their psychometric properties. This article proposes several methods to evaluate the unidimensionality and reliability of three measures of diversity. To approximate the interval scale required by the measures of diversity, a transformation on the Likert-item scores is proposed. Ridge maximum likelihood is used to deal with the issue of small sample size, and methods for evaluating the significance of the difference of two reliability estimates with correlated samples are also developed. Results with a real data set on entrepreneurial teams indicate that different measures of diversity may correspond to significantly different estimates of reliability. Results also indicate that diversity measures obtained with the transformed data tend to be more unidimensional than their counterparts obtained from Likert data. However, diversity measures obtained from Likert data tend to yield greater reliability estimates. Among the three examined measures of diversity, the standard deviation is found to yield greater and more efficient reliability estimates than the others and is thus recommended.

摘要

团队成员之间的某种多样性有利于组织的发展。虽然人们对多种量化多样性的方法的心理测量特性知之甚少,但已经提出了多种措施来量化多样性。本文提出了几种方法来评估三种多样性测量方法的单维性和可靠性。为了近似多样性测量所需的区间尺度,提出了对李克特量表项目得分的转换。岭极大似然法用于处理小样本量问题,还开发了评估相关样本两个可靠性估计值差异显著性的方法。一个关于创业团队的真实数据集的结果表明,不同的多样性测量方法可能对应于显著不同的可靠性估计值。结果还表明,通过转换后的数据获得的多样性测量方法往往比从李克特数据获得的对应方法更具单维性。然而,从李克特数据获得的多样性测量方法往往会产生更高的可靠性估计值。在三种被检验的多样性测量方法中,发现标准差比其他方法能产生更高且更有效的可靠性估计值,因此推荐使用。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):512-534. doi: 10.1177/0013164414541275. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
2
Three Mahalanobis distances and their role in assessing unidimensionality.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004 May;57(Pt 1):151-65. doi: 10.1348/000711004849231.
4
An External Validity Approach for Assessing Essential Unidimensionality in Correlated-Factor Models.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;79(3):437-461. doi: 10.1177/0013164418824755. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
5
A unified approach to multi-item reliability.
Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):1061-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01373.x.
6
Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale).
BMC Psychol. 2016 Feb 10;4:8. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x.
7
What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?
Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S94-S105. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00272.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/0013164416658325. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1999 Apr 1;34(2):181-97. doi: 10.1207/S15327906Mb340203.
3
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
4
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):1008-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
5
Indexing systematic rater agreement with a latent-class model.
Psychol Methods. 2002 Sep;7(3):384-95. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.3.384.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验