Suppr超能文献

基于计算机的 CT 结肠成像(CT 结肠造影)的自我训练,包括有和没有 CAD 的情况。

Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Viale Morgani 50, 50134, Florence, Italy.

im3D S.p.A., Via Livorno 60, 10153, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4783-4791. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5480-5. Epub 2018 May 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether (1) computer-based self-training for CT colonography (CTC) improves interpretation performance of novice readers; (2) computer-aided detection (CAD) use during training affects learning.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval and patients' informed consent were obtained for all cases included in this study. Twenty readers (17 radiology residents, 3 radiologists) with no experience in CTC interpretation were recruited in three centres. After an introductory course, readers performed a baseline assessment test (37 cases) using CAD as second reader. Then they were randomized (1:1) to perform either a computer-based self-training (150 cases verified at colonoscopy) with CAD as second reader or the same training without CAD. The same assessment test was repeated after completion of the training programs. Main outcome was per lesion sensitivity (≥ 6 mm). A generalized estimating equation model was applied to evaluate readers' performance and the impact of CAD use during training.

RESULTS

After training, there was a significant improvement in average per lesion sensitivity in the unassisted phase, from 74% (356/480) to 83% (396/480) (p < 0.001), and in the CAD-assisted phase, from 83% (399/480) to 87% (417/480) (p = 0.021), but not in average per patient sensitivity, from 93% (390/420) to 94% (395/420) (p = 0.41), and specificity, from 81% (260/320) to 86% (276/320) (p = 0.15). No significant effect of CAD use during training was observed on per patient sensitivity and specificity, nor on per lesion sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

A computer-based self-training program for CTC improves readers' per lesion sensitivity. CAD as second reader does not have a significant impact on learning if used during training.

KEY POINTS

• Computer-based self-training for CT colonography improves per lesion sensitivity of novice readers. • Self-training program does not increase per patient specificity of novice readers. • CAD used during training does not have significant impact on learning.

摘要

目的

确定(1)基于计算机的 CT 结肠成像(CTC)自学是否能提高新手读者的解读性能;(2)培训期间使用计算机辅助检测(CAD)是否会影响学习效果。

方法

本研究中所有病例均经机构审查委员会批准并获得患者知情同意。在三个中心招募了 20 名没有 CTC 解读经验的读者(17 名放射科住院医师,3 名放射科医生)。在介绍课程之后,读者使用 CAD 作为第二读者进行基线评估测试(37 例)。然后,他们被随机(1:1)分为两组,一组使用基于计算机的自学(150 例经结肠镜检查验证),另一组使用 CAD 作为第二读者进行相同的培训。完成培训计划后,重复进行相同的评估测试。主要结果是每处病变的灵敏度(≥6mm)。应用广义估计方程模型评估读者的表现和培训期间使用 CAD 的影响。

结果

培训后,无辅助阶段的平均每处病变灵敏度从 74%(356/480)显著提高到 83%(396/480)(p<0.001),CAD 辅助阶段的平均每处病变灵敏度从 83%(399/480)提高到 87%(417/480)(p=0.021),但平均每位患者的灵敏度(93%(390/420)至 94%(395/420))(p=0.41)和特异性(81%(260/320)至 86%(276/320))(p=0.15)无显著变化。培训期间使用 CAD 对每位患者的灵敏度和特异性以及每处病变的灵敏度均无显著影响。

结论

基于计算机的 CTC 自学程序可提高新手读者的每处病变灵敏度。如果在培训期间使用 CAD 作为第二读者,则不会对学习效果产生显著影响。

关键点

  1. 基于计算机的 CT 结肠成像自学可提高新手读者的每处病变灵敏度。

  2. 自学计划不会增加新手读者的每位患者特异性。

  3. 培训期间使用 CAD 不会对学习产生显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验