Thiagarajan Ganesh, Begonia Mark T, Dallas Mark, Lara-Castillo Nuria, Scott JoAnna M, Johnson Mark L
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 350K Robert H. Flarsheim Hall, 5110 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110 e-mail: .
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 350K Robert H. Flarsheim Hall, 5110 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110.
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jul 1;140(7):0710111-07101111. doi: 10.1115/1.4039982.
The determination of the elastic modulus of bone is important in studying the response of bone to loading and is determined using a destructive three-point bending method. Reference point indentation (RPI), with one cycle of indentation, offers a nondestructive alternative to determine the elastic modulus. While the elastic modulus could be determined using a nondestructive procedure for ex vivo experiments, for in vivo testing, the three-point bending technique may not be practical and hence RPI is viewed as a potential alternative and explored in this study. Using the RPI measurements, total indentation distance (TID), creep indentation distance, indentation force, and the unloading slope, we have developed a numerical analysis procedure using the Oliver-Pharr (O/P) method to estimate the indentation elastic modulus. Two methods were used to determine the area function: (1) Oliver-Pharr (O/P-based on a numerical procedure) and (2) geometric (based on the calculation of the projected area of indentation). The indentation moduli of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) calculated by the O/P (3.49-3.68 GPa) and geometric (3.33-3.49 GPa) methods were similar to values in literature (3.5-4 GPa). In a study using femurs from C57Bl/6 mice of different ages and genders, the three-point bending modulus was lower than the indentation modulus. In femurs from 4 to 5 months old TOPGAL mice, we found that the indentation modulus from the geometric (5.61 ± 1.25 GPa) and O/P (5.53 ± 1.27 GPa) methods was higher than the three-point bending modulus (5.28 ± 0.34 GPa). In females, the indentation modulus from the geometric (7.45 ± 0.86 GPa) and O/P (7.46 ± 0.92 GPa) methods was also higher than the three-point bending modulus (7.33 ± 1.13 GPa). We can conclude from this study that the RPI determined values are relatively close to three-point bending values.
确定骨的弹性模量对于研究骨对负荷的反应很重要,通常采用破坏性三点弯曲法来测定。参考点压痕法(RPI),通过一个压痕循环,为测定弹性模量提供了一种非破坏性的替代方法。虽然对于离体实验,可以使用非破坏性程序来确定弹性模量,但对于体内测试,三点弯曲技术可能并不实用,因此RPI被视为一种潜在的替代方法,并在本研究中进行了探索。利用RPI测量得到的总压痕距离(TID)、蠕变压痕距离、压痕力和卸载斜率,我们采用Oliver-Pharr(O/P)方法开发了一种数值分析程序来估计压痕弹性模量。使用了两种方法来确定面积函数:(1)Oliver-Pharr(基于数值程序)和(2)几何方法(基于压痕投影面积的计算)。通过O/P方法(3.49 - 3.68 GPa)和几何方法(3.33 - 3.49 GPa)计算得到的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的压痕模量与文献值(3.5 - 4 GPa)相似。在一项使用不同年龄和性别的C57Bl/6小鼠股骨的研究中,三点弯曲模量低于压痕模量。在4至5月龄的TOPGAL小鼠的股骨中,我们发现几何方法(5.61±1.25 GPa)和O/P方法(5.53±1.27 GPa)得到的压痕模量高于三点弯曲模量(5.28±0.34 GPa)。在雌性小鼠中,几何方法(7.45±0.86 GPa)和O/P方法(7.46±0.92 GPa)得到的压痕模量也高于三点弯曲模量(7.33±1.13 GPa)。从本研究中我们可以得出结论,RPI测定的值相对接近三点弯曲值。