Suppr超能文献

男性 dhat 综合征的精神病理学的定性研究:对障碍分类的影响。

A qualitative study on psychopathology of dhat syndrome in men: Implications for classification of disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Fourth Floor, Academic Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Department of Psychiatry, Fourth Floor, Academic Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.

出版信息

Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Jun;35:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dhat syndrome is regarded by many as a culture bound syndrome of the Indian sub-continent. However the nosological status, conceptual understanding of the condition as well as the diagnostic guidelines are all mired in controversy.

AIMS

The current study aims to study the psychopathology of Dhat syndrome in men by using a qualitative approach and to arrive at an operational definition for diagnosing Dhat syndrome.

METHOD

The qualitative approach consisted of five Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and five Key Individual Interviews (KII) with participants, consisting of patients as well as doctors - both allopathic as well as traditional.

RESULTS

Detailed analysis revealed valuable data regarding the symptoms, causes, treatment measures, socio-cultural context, psychiatric co-morbidity, nature of the disorder and various other phenomenological dimensions. Ideas for future nosological positioning were also specifically looked for. Operational definition and diagnostic guidelines were also arrived at based on the analysis as well as on previous literature.

CONCLUSION

Although lot of agreement existed among various stakeholders about symptoms and presentation, they varied significantly in their opinion on nature of the condition and treatment. Suggestions for ICD 11 have been made.

摘要

背景

许多人认为 Dhat 综合征是印度次大陆特有的一种与文化相关的综合征。然而,该病症的分类地位、概念理解以及诊断指南都存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在通过定性方法研究男性 Dhat 综合征的精神病理学,并为 Dhat 综合征的诊断制定操作性定义。

方法

定性方法包括五组焦点小组讨论(FGD)和五组关键个体访谈(KII),参与者包括患者以及医生,包括传统医学和现代医学。

结果

详细分析揭示了有关症状、病因、治疗措施、社会文化背景、精神共病、疾病性质和各种其他现象学维度的有价值数据。还特别寻找了未来分类定位的想法。基于分析和先前的文献,还制定了操作性定义和诊断指南。

结论

尽管各种利益相关者对症状和表现有很多共识,但他们对疾病的性质和治疗方法的看法存在很大差异。已经为 ICD-11 提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验