Lai X J, Lian J S, Chen J Y, Zhang Y M, Jia H Y, Zheng L, Yang Y D
Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The first affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 20;26(2):113-118. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.02.008.
To observe the efficacy and safety of de novo combination of Lamivudine(LAM) and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) therapy counter to Entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)- related compensated liver cirrhosis. Patients with chronic hepatitis B-related compensated cirrhosis who were initially treated with LAM and ADV for more than 1 year were randomly assigned to two groups, one half replaced with ETV monotherapy, and the other half continued LAM and ADV co-therapy. Liver biochemistry, renal biochemistry, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alpha-fetoprotein, HBV serology markers and serum HBV DNA were measured every 3 months. Urine β2-microglobulin was measured every 6 months And retinol binding protein, followed up for 3 years. The mean values of the two groups were compared with t-test, and the rate of comparison was analyzed by x2 test. A total of 580 cases were collected, 290 cases were replaced with ETV monotherapy, the other 290 patients continued to LAM and ADV combination therapy. In the ETV group, the rates of HBV DNA negative conversion at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were 77.6%, 84.5% and 94.5% respectively, while the HBV DNA negative conversion rates at 1, 2 and 3 years in the LAM and ADV combination groups were 69.3%, 73.4% and 80.3% respectively. Among them, the negative rates of HBV DNA in the second year and the third year were < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. The 3-year cumulative gene-resistant rate in the ETV group was 1.4%, while the combined treatment was as high as 8.6%, and the difference was statistically significant in the two groups. The estimated value of serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate in ETV group was followed by 3 years, and the baseline level was maintained, in the same group, the serum creatinine was higher than baseline, and the estimated value of glomerular filtration rate decreased. The results showed that there were 6.2%, 12.1%, 22.1% and 0, 0.3%, 1%, respectively, in 1, 2 and 3 years for the group of consecutive treatment and the replacement of ETV Group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by more than 30% compared with the baseline. The difference was statistically significant; the proportion of serum creatinine in the 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of the combined treatment group was 1.7%, 4.5% and 6.6%, compared with the baseline rise of > 50 μmol/l, and the ETV group was replaced in the 1 year, The values of 2 and 3 years were 0,0,0.7%, of which the 2nd and 3rd years were statistically significant; the proportion of microalbuminuria and retinol-binding protein in patients with combined treatment group was also significantly higher than that of Β2-m ETV Group. The initial combination of LAM and ADV therapy is inferior in terms of ETV monotherapy. Single therapy with ETV increase the rate of viral response, reduce the incidence of drug resistance, and also reduce the incidence of renal impairment in patients with chronic hepatitis B -related compensated liver cirrhosis.
观察拉米夫定(LAM)与阿德福韦酯(ADV)联合初治对比恩替卡韦(ETV)单药治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)相关代偿期肝硬化患者的疗效及安全性。将初始接受LAM和ADV联合治疗1年以上的慢性乙型肝炎相关代偿期肝硬化患者随机分为两组,一组换用ETV单药治疗,另一组继续LAM和ADV联合治疗。每3个月检测肝生化、肾生化、估计肾小球滤过率、甲胎蛋白、HBV血清学标志物及血清HBV DNA。每6个月检测尿β2-微球蛋白及视黄醇结合蛋白,随访3年。两组均值比较采用t检验,率的比较采用x2检验。共收集580例,290例换用ETV单药治疗,另290例继续LAM和ADV联合治疗。ETV组1年、2年、3年HBV DNA转阴率分别为77.6%、84.5%、94.5%,而LAM和ADV联合组1年、2年、3年HBV DNA转阴率分别为69.3%、73.4%、80.3%。其中,第二年和第三年HBV DNA阴性率<0.05,差异有统计学意义。ETV组3年累计基因耐药率为1.4%,而联合治疗组高达8.6%,两组差异有统计学意义。ETV组血清肌酐及肾小球滤过率估计值随访3年维持基线水平,联合治疗组血清肌酐高于基线,肾小球滤过率估计值下降。结果显示,连续治疗组和换用ETV组1年、2年、3年肾小球滤过率估计值较基线下降超过30%的比例分别为6.2%、12.1%、22.1%和0、0.3%、1%,差异有统计学意义;联合治疗组1年、2年、3年血清肌酐较基线上升>50μmol/l的比例分别为1.7%、4.5%、6.6%,而换用ETV组1年、2年、3年分别为0、0、0.7%,其中第二年和第三年差异有统计学意义;联合治疗组患者微量白蛋白尿及视黄醇结合蛋白比例也显著高于ETV组。LAM和ADV联合初治在疗效方面劣于ETV单药治疗。ETV单药治疗可提高病毒应答率,降低耐药发生率,还可降低慢性乙型肝炎相关代偿期肝硬化患者肾功能损害的发生率。