• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全肩关节置换术能否提高患者的活动水平?

Does total shoulder arthroplasty improve patients' activity levels?

机构信息

Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA; University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1987-1995. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.028
PMID:29804913
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) decreases pain, improves range of motion, and increases strength. Whether these improvements translate to improvements in activity levels postoperatively remains unknown. The Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) is a valid and reliable outcomes survey that measures the patient's activity level. Currently, no studies have specifically examined the effect of TSA on SAL.

METHODS

A prospective collection of preoperative, patient-determined outcomes on patients undergoing TSA was compared with postoperative scores at a minimum of 2 years. These scores included the SAL, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing primary anatomic TSA or reverse TSA.

RESULTS

A mean follow-up of 3.7 years was available for 80 anatomic and 42 reverse TSAs. Anatomic TSAs had improvements from median preoperative scores to median postoperative scores for WOOS (34 to 89; P < .0001), ASES (30 to 87; P < .0001), SST (2 to 9; P < .0001), and SANE scores (23 to 90; P < .0001). The SAL improved from 7 to 8 but did not quite reach statistical significance (P = .07). Reverse TSAs had improvements from median preoperative scores to median postoperative scores for WOOS (31 to 83; P < .0001), ASES (29 to 82; P < .0001), SST (2 to 7; P < .0001), and SANE scores (20 to 85; P < .0001). The SAL improved from 4.5 to 6, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .38). However, when anatomic and reverse TSAs were analyzed together, a statistically significant improvement was found postoperatively in the SAL (from 6 to 8; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic TSA and reverse TSA improved activity levels. In addition, disease-specific and joint-specific quality of life scores all had statistically significant improvements. This study suggests that after shoulder arthroplasty patients in general have (1) significant improvements in their quality of life and (2) have small improvements in activity level. This study shows that most patients do not have to decrease their activity levels to diminish symptoms to an acceptable range.

摘要

背景

全肩关节置换术(TSA)可减轻疼痛、改善活动范围并增强力量。这些改善是否能转化为术后活动水平的提高尚不清楚。肩关节活动水平(SAL)是一种有效的、可靠的测量患者活动水平的结果调查。目前,尚无专门研究 TSA 对 SAL 的影响的研究。

方法

前瞻性收集行 TSA 患者的术前、患者确定的结果,并与至少 2 年的术后评分进行比较。这些评分包括 SAL、西部安大略省肩关节炎指数(WOOS)、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)标准化肩部评估、单一评估数字评估(SANE)和简单肩部测试(SST)。纳入标准为接受原发性解剖 TSA 或反向 TSA 的患者。

结果

80 例解剖 TSA 和 42 例反向 TSA 可获得平均 3.7 年的随访。解剖 TSA 的 WOOS(从 34 分升至 89 分;P<0.0001)、ASES(从 30 分升至 87 分;P<0.0001)、SST(从 2 分升至 9 分;P<0.0001)和 SANE 评分(从 23 分升至 90 分)均有改善。SAL 从 7 分提高到 8 分,但未达到统计学意义(P=0.07)。反向 TSA 的 WOOS(从 31 分升至 83 分;P<0.0001)、ASES(从 29 分升至 82 分;P<0.0001)、SST(从 2 分升至 7 分;P<0.0001)和 SANE 评分(从 20 分升至 85 分)均有改善。SAL 从 4.5 分提高到 6 分,但未达到统计学意义(P=0.38)。然而,当将解剖 TSA 和反向 TSA 一起分析时,SAL 术后有统计学意义的改善(从 6 分升至 8 分;P=0.006)。

结论

解剖 TSA 和反向 TSA 可提高活动水平。此外,特定于疾病和特定于关节的生活质量评分均有显著改善。本研究表明,一般情况下,肩部置换术后患者(1)生活质量有显著改善,(2)活动水平有小幅度提高。本研究表明,大多数患者不必降低活动水平,即可将症状减轻到可接受的范围。

相似文献

1
Does total shoulder arthroplasty improve patients' activity levels?全肩关节置换术能否提高患者的活动水平?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1987-1995. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort analysis.解剖型全肩关节置换失败后的挽救性反式全肩关节置换:一项队列分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S134-S138. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.013.
3
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.确定美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩部测试以及用于测量肩关节置换术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
Does arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improve patients' activity levels?关节镜下肩袖修复术能提高患者的活动水平吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Dec;27(12):2167-2174. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
Rate of Improvement in Clinical Outcomes with Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术临床疗效的改善率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):1801-1811. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01387.
6
Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?单纯性评估数值评估(SANE)能否作为全肩关节置换术后患者的独立结局评估工具?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):e426-e435. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.036. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 70 years of age and older: a comparison cohort at early to midterm follow-up.70 岁及以上患者的解剖型和反式肩关节置换术:早期至中期随访的比较队列研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1336-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Risk factors for failing to achieve improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.肩峰下型骨关节炎全肩关节置换术后失败的危险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):968-975. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.在接受肩袖修复术的患者中,单一评估数值评估(Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation)评分与术后美国肩肘外科医生(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)评分呈正相关。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jan;29(1):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
10
Revision to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Restores Stability for Patients With Unstable Shoulder Prostheses.反向全肩关节置换术的翻修恢复了不稳定肩关节假体患者的稳定性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2716-2722. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5429-z. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.反肩关节置换术的适应症是否应继续扩大?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):313-332. doi: 10.1111/os.14311. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Evaluating the effects of age on the long-term functional outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.评估年龄对解剖型全肩关节置换术后长期功能结局的影响。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Sep;26(3):231-237. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00409. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
The recovery curve of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: midterm results at a minimum of 5 years.
原发性盂肱关节骨关节炎解剖型全肩关节置换术的恢复曲线:至少5年的中期结果
JSES Int. 2022 May 13;6(4):587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.011. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Persistent joint pain and arm function in former baseball players.前职业棒球运动员的持续性关节疼痛与手臂功能
JSES Int. 2021 Jun 29;5(5):912-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.001. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.
6
Treatment type may influence degree of post-dislocation shoulder osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗类型可能影响肩关节脱位后骨关节炎的严重程度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2312-2324. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06263-3. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Substantial clinical benefit, responsiveness, and sensitivity to change of three common outcome measures following shoulder arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后三种常见疗效指标的显著临床获益、反应性及对变化的敏感性。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Jul 27;8:2050312120946218. doi: 10.1177/2050312120946218. eCollection 2020.
8
[Shoulder Osteoarthritis-pathogenesis, classification, diagnostics and treatment].[肩骨关节炎——发病机制、分类、诊断与治疗]
Orthopade. 2019 Sep;48(9):795-808. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03792-9.
9
Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases.扩髓打压植骨与全肩关节置换:544 例同期病例的患者和肩关节特点。
Int Orthop. 2019 Sep;43(9):2105-2115. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04352-8. Epub 2019 Jun 25.