Rachmiel A, Emodi O, Rachmiel D, Israel Y, Shilo D
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel; Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Oct;47(10):1350-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 26.
Alveolar bone deficiency is a very common problem encountered by the practitioner when planning dental implants. The severity of the deficiency is variable. Many practitioners perform augmentation using the method they feel comfortable with and do not necessarily use the most appropriate method. This is a retrospective study on 21 patients between the ages of 25 and 63 years exhibiting moderate vertical alveolar bone deficiency and treated by the sandwich technique. Mean vertical bone gain was 7.5mm. Sixty-one dental implants were inserted showing a survival rate of 96.7% with a median of 3.1 years follow-up. Main advantages of the method include minimal relapse, single operation and preservation of the native cortical bone in the occlusal surface. We believe the surgeon should maintain the capability of using different augmentation techniques and utilize them appropriately for different severities of deficiency. We wish to establish a paradigm for using different augmentation methods We recommend using the sandwich technique in the moderate deficient cases as described in this work, using alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the severe cases as described in our previous work, where lack of soft tissue for proper closure is a major limitation, and using guided bone regeneration for minor deficiencies.
牙槽骨缺损是从业者在计划植入牙种植体时遇到的一个非常常见的问题。缺损的严重程度各不相同。许多从业者采用他们觉得顺手的方法进行增量手术,而不一定使用最合适的方法。这是一项对21名年龄在25至63岁之间、表现为中度垂直牙槽骨缺损并采用三明治技术治疗的患者进行的回顾性研究。平均垂直骨增量为7.5毫米。共植入61颗牙种植体,生存率为96.7%,中位随访时间为3.1年。该方法的主要优点包括复发最小、单次手术以及保留咬合面的天然皮质骨。我们认为外科医生应保持使用不同增量技术的能力,并针对不同严重程度的缺损适当加以运用。我们希望建立一个使用不同增量方法的范例。我们建议,对于中度缺损病例,采用本研究所述的三明治技术;对于严重病例,采用我们之前研究中所述的牙槽骨牵张成骨技术,在这些严重病例中,缺乏用于妥善封闭的软组织是一个主要限制因素;对于轻度缺损,则采用引导骨再生技术。