Correll Christoph U, Rubio Jose M, Kane John M
Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA.
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):149-160. doi: 10.1002/wps.20516.
The long-term benefit-to-risk ratio of sustained antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia has recently been questioned. In this paper, we critically examine the literature on the long-term efficacy and effectiveness of this treatment. We also review the evidence on the undesired effects, the impact on physical morbidity and mortality, as well as the neurobiological correlates of chronic exposure to antipsychotics. Finally, we summarize factors that affect the risk-benefit ratio. There is consistent evidence supporting the efficacy of antipsychotics in the short term and mid term following stabilization of acute psychotic symptoms. There is insufficient evidence supporting the notion that this effect changes in the long term. Most, but not all, of the long-term cohort studies find a decrease in efficacy during chronic treatment with antipsychotics. However, these results are inconclusive, given the extensive risk of bias, including increasing non-adherence. On the other hand, long-term studies based on national registries, which have lower risk of bias, find an advantage in terms of effectiveness during sustained antipsychotic treatment. Sustained antipsychotic treatment has been also consistently associated with lower mortality in people with schizophrenia compared to no antipsychotic treatment. Nevertheless, chronic antipsychotic use is associated with metabolic disturbance and tardive dyskinesia. The latter is the clearest undesired clinical consequence of brain functioning as a potential result of chronic antipsychotic exposure, likely from dopaminergic hypersensitivity, without otherwise clear evidence of other irreversible neurobiological changes. Adjunctive psychosocial interventions seem critical for achieving recovery. However, overall, the current literature does not support the safe reduction of antipsychotic dosages by 50% or more in stabilized individuals receiving adjunctive psychosocial interventions. In conclusion, the critical appraisal of the literature indicates that, although chronic antipsychotic use can be associated with undesirable neurologic and metabolic side effects, the evidence supporting its long-term efficacy and effectiveness, including impact on life expectancy, outweighs the evidence against this practice, overall indicating a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio. However, the finding that a minority of individuals diagnosed initially with schizophrenia appear to be relapse free for long periods, despite absence of sustained antipsychotic treatment, calls for further research on patient-level predictors of positive outcomes in people with an initial psychotic presentation.
精神分裂症持续抗精神病治疗的长期风险效益比最近受到了质疑。在本文中,我们批判性地审视了关于这种治疗的长期疗效和有效性的文献。我们还回顾了有关不良反应、对身体发病率和死亡率的影响以及长期接触抗精神病药物的神经生物学相关性的证据。最后,我们总结了影响风险效益比的因素。有一致的证据支持抗精神病药物在急性精神病症状稳定后的短期和中期的疗效。没有足够的证据支持这种效果在长期会发生变化的观点。大多数(但不是全部)长期队列研究发现,在抗精神病药物的长期治疗期间疗效会下降。然而,鉴于包括依从性下降在内的广泛偏倚风险,这些结果尚无定论。另一方面,基于国家登记处的长期研究,其偏倚风险较低,发现在持续抗精神病治疗期间在有效性方面具有优势。与不使用抗精神病药物治疗相比,持续抗精神病治疗也一直与精神分裂症患者较低的死亡率相关。然而,长期使用抗精神病药物与代谢紊乱和迟发性运动障碍有关。后者是慢性接触抗精神病药物可能导致的脑功能最明显的不良临床后果,可能源于多巴胺能超敏反应,而没有其他明确的不可逆神经生物学变化的证据。辅助性心理社会干预似乎对实现康复至关重要。然而,总体而言,目前的文献不支持在接受辅助性心理社会干预的病情稳定的个体中安全地将抗精神病药物剂量减少50%或更多。总之,对文献的批判性评估表明,虽然长期使用抗精神病药物可能与不良的神经和代谢副作用有关,但支持其长期疗效和有效性(包括对预期寿命的影响)的证据超过了反对这种做法的证据,总体表明风险效益比有利。然而,少数最初被诊断为精神分裂症的个体在没有持续抗精神病药物治疗的情况下似乎长期无复发,这一发现需要对初始有精神病表现的患者中积极结果的个体水平预测因素进行进一步研究。