Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1552-1561. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5001-8. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
To evaluate the influence of different scan parameters for single-energy CT and dual-energy CT, as well as the impact of different material used in a TKA prosthesis on image quality and the extent of metal artifacts.
Eight pairs of TKA prostheses from different vendors were examined in a phantom set-up. Each pair consisted of a conventional CoCr prosthesis and the corresponding anti-allergic prosthesis (full titanium, ceramic, or ceramic-coated) from the same vendor. Nine different (seven dual-energy CT and two single-energy CT) scan protocols with different characteristics were used to determine the most suitable CT protocol for TKA imaging. Quantitative image analysis included assessment of blooming artifacts (metal implants appear thicker on CT than they are, given as virtual growth in mm in this paper) and streak artifacts (thick dark lines around metal). Qualitative image analysis was used to investigate the bone-prosthesis interface.
The full titanium prosthesis and full ceramic knee showed significantly fewer blooming artifacts compared to the standard CoCr prosthesis (mean virtual growth 0.6-2.2 mm compared to 2.9-4.6 mm, p < 0.001). Dual-energy CT protocols showed less blooming (range 3.3-3.8 mm) compared to single-energy protocols (4.6-5.5 mm). The full titanium and full ceramic prostheses showed significantly fewer streak artifacts (mean standard deviation 77-86 Hounsfield unit (HU)) compared to the standard CoCr prosthesis (277-334 HU, p < 0.001). All dual-energy CT protocols had fewer metal streak artifacts (215-296 HU compared to single-energy CT protocols (392-497 HU)). Full titanium and ceramic prostheses were ranked superior with regard to the image quality at the bone/prosthesis interface compared to a standard CoCr prosthesis, and all dual-energy CT protocols were ranked better than single-energy protocols.
Dual-energy CT and ceramic or titanium prostheses reduce CT artifacts and provide superior image quality of total knee arthroplasty at the bone/prosthesis interface. These findings support the use of dual-energy CT as a solid imaging base for clinical decision-making and the use of full-titanium or ceramic prostheses to allow for better CT visualization of the bone-prosthesis interface.
评估单能 CT 和双能 CT 的不同扫描参数以及 TKA 假体中不同材料对图像质量和金属伪影程度的影响。
在体模设置中检查了来自不同供应商的 8 对 TKA 假体。每对假体均由来自同一供应商的常规 CoCr 假体和相应的抗过敏假体(全钛、陶瓷或陶瓷涂层)组成。使用了 9 种不同的(7 种双能 CT 和 2 种单能 CT)扫描方案,具有不同的特点,以确定最适合 TKA 成像的 CT 方案。定量图像分析包括评估晕影伪影(金属植入物在 CT 上比实际更厚,本文中以虚拟增长毫米表示)和条纹伪影(金属周围的粗黑线)。定性图像分析用于研究骨-假体界面。
全钛假体和全陶瓷膝关节与标准 CoCr 假体相比,晕影伪影明显减少(虚拟增长 0.6-2.2mm,而标准 CoCr 假体为 2.9-4.6mm,p<0.001)。双能 CT 方案的晕影伪影(范围为 3.3-3.8mm)明显少于单能方案(4.6-5.5mm)。全钛和全陶瓷假体的条纹伪影明显少于标准 CoCr 假体(平均值标准差 77-86 亨氏单位(HU))(277-334 HU,p<0.001)。所有双能 CT 方案的金属条纹伪影(215-296 HU)均明显少于单能 CT 方案(392-497 HU)。与标准 CoCr 假体相比,全钛和陶瓷假体在骨/假体界面的图像质量方面表现更好,所有双能 CT 方案的评分均优于单能方案。
双能 CT 和陶瓷或钛假体可减少 CT 伪影,并提供更好的全膝关节置换术骨/假体界面的图像质量。这些发现支持使用双能 CT 作为临床决策的可靠成像基础,以及使用全钛或陶瓷假体以实现更好的 CT 可视化骨-假体界面。