Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinyi Road, Baqiao District, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Bothwin Clinical Study Consultant, Bellevue, WA, USA.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):259-272. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4786-5. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).
Meta-analysis.
We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.
Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision.
评估随机对照试验的现有数据,以评估冷冻所有胚胎并随后进行冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)是否比新鲜胚胎移植(ET)获得更好的临床结局。
荟萃分析。
我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库上进行了电子文献检索,并从相关引文手动补充了另外 2 篇文章。最终有 7 项研究纳入荟萃分析,共纳入 1141 名接受新鲜胚胎移植和 1079 名接受冷冻胚胎移植的女性。荟萃分析结果表明,FET 组的活产率[RR(95%CI)1.18(1.08-1.30),P=0.0003]和临床妊娠率[RR(95%CI)1.10(1.02-1.19),P=0.02]显著更高。FET 组的流产率[RR(95%CI)0.62(0.48-0.80),P=0.0002]和中重度 OHSS 发生率[RR(95%CI)0.22(0.12 至 0.39),P<0.00001]显著更低。两组间生化妊娠率、持续妊娠率和着床率的差异无统计学意义。
我们的结果表明,与 ET 相比,FET 的 IVF/ICSI 更有效且 OHSS 风险更低。然而,我们应该全面告知患者胚胎冷冻保存的相关优势、劣势和潜在风险,并仔细评估他们的生育状况,以做出最有益的临床决策。