Motoyama Yasushi, Nakajima Tsukasa, Takamura Yoshiaki, Nakazawa Tsutomu, Wajima Daisuke, Takeshima Yasuhiro, Matsuda Ryosuke, Tamura Kentaro, Yamada Shuichi, Yokota Hiroshi, Nakagawa Ichiro, Nishimura Fumihiko, Park Young-Su, Nakamura Mitsutoshi, Nakase Hiroyuki
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun 8;130(5):1710-1720. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172215. Print 2019 May 1.
Lumbar spinal drainage (LSD) during neurosurgery can have an important effect by facilitating a smooth procedure when needed. However, LSD is quite invasive, and the pathology of brain herniation associated with LSD has become known recently. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of postoperative brain herniation after craniotomy with LSD in neurosurgery overall.
Included were 239 patients who underwent craniotomy with LSD for various types of neurological diseases between January 2007 and December 2016. The authors performed propensity score matching to establish a proper control group taken from among 1424 patients who underwent craniotomy and met the inclusion criteria during the same period. The incidences of postoperative brain herniation between the patients who underwent craniotomy with LSD (group A, n = 239) and the matched patients who underwent craniotomy without LSD (group B, n = 239) were compared.
Brain herniation was observed in 24 patients in group A and 8 patients in group B (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.36-8.46, p = 0.005), but the rate of favorable outcomes was higher in group A (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.18-2.76, p = 0.005). Of the 24 patients, 18 had uncal herniation, 5 had central herniation, and 1 had uncal and subfalcine herniation; 8 patients with other than subarachnoid hemorrhage were included. Significant differences in the rates of deep approach (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.8-14.5, p = 0.002) and temporal craniotomy (OR 10.2, 95% CI 2.3-44.8, p = 0.002) were found between the 2 subgroups (those with and those without herniation) in group A. In 5 patients, brain herniation proceeded even after external decompression (ED). Cox regression analysis revealed that the risk of brain herniation related to LSD increased with ED (hazard ratio 3.326, 95% CI 1.491-7.422, p < 0.001). Among all 1424 patients, ED resulted in progression or deterioration of brain herniation more frequently in those who underwent LSD than it did in those who did not undergo LSD (OR 9.127, 95% CI 1.82-62.1, p = 0.004).
Brain herniation downward to the tentorial hiatus is more likely to occur after craniotomy with LSD than after craniotomy without LSD. Using a deep approach and craniotomy involving the temporal areas are risk factors for brain herniation related to LSD. Additional ED would aggravate brain herniation after LSD. The risk of brain herniation after placement of a lumbar spinal drain during neurosurgery must be considered even when LSD is essential.
神经外科手术期间的腰椎脊髓引流(LSD)在必要时可通过促进手术顺利进行而产生重要作用。然而,LSD具有相当的侵入性,且与LSD相关的脑疝病理情况最近才为人所知。本研究的目的是确定神经外科手术中采用LSD进行开颅术后发生术后脑疝的风险。
纳入2007年1月至2016年12月期间因各种神经系统疾病接受LSD开颅手术的239例患者。作者进行倾向评分匹配,以从同期接受开颅手术且符合纳入标准的1424例患者中建立一个合适的对照组。比较接受LSD开颅手术的患者(A组,n = 239)和匹配的未接受LSD开颅手术的患者(B组,n = 239)术后脑疝的发生率。
A组24例患者和B组8例患者出现脑疝(比值比3.21,95%可信区间1.36 - 8.46,p = 0.005),但A组的良好结局率更高(比值比1.79,95%可信区间1.18 - 2.76,p = 0.005)。在这24例患者中,18例为钩回疝,5例为中央疝,1例为钩回和大脑镰下疝;包括8例非蛛网膜下腔出血患者。A组的两个亚组(有脑疝和无脑疝)之间在深部入路率(比值比5.12,95%可信区间1.8 - 14.5,p = 0.002)和颞部开颅率(比值比10.2,95%可信区间2.3 - 44.8,p = 0.002)方面存在显著差异。5例患者即使在进行了外部减压(ED)后脑疝仍进展。Cox回归分析显示,与LSD相关的脑疝风险随ED而增加(风险比3.326,95%可信区间1.491 - 7.422,p < 0.001)。在所有1424例患者中,接受LSD的患者中ED导致脑疝进展或恶化的情况比未接受LSD的患者更频繁(比值比9.127,95%可信区间1.82 - 62.1,p = 0.004)。
与未使用LSD的开颅术后相比,使用LSD进行开颅术后更易发生向下至小脑幕裂孔的脑疝。采用深部入路和涉及颞部区域的开颅手术是与LSD相关的脑疝的危险因素。额外的ED会加重LSD后的脑疝。即使LSD必不可少,在神经外科手术中放置腰椎脊髓引流管后发生脑疝的风险也必须予以考虑。