Sandberg Evelien M, Leinweber Fleur S, Herbschleb Petra J, Berends-van der Meer Dorien M A, Jansen Frank Willem
a Department of Gynaecology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands.
b Department of Biomechanical Engineering , Delft University of Technology , Delft , The Netherlands.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;38(8):1115-1120. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1447914. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the catheterisation regimes after a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) in Dutch hospitals and to assess the nurses' opinion on this topic. This was particularly relevant as no consensus exists on the best moment to remove a urinary catheter after an LH. All 89 Dutch hospitals were successfully contacted and provided information on their catheterisation regime after LH: 69 (77.5%) hospitals reported removing the catheter the next morning after the LH, while nine hospitals (10.1%) removed it directly at the end of the procedure. The other 11 hospitals had different policies (four hours, up to two days). Additionally, all nurses working in the gynaecology departments of the hospitals affiliated to Leiden University were asked to fill in a self-developed questionnaire. Of the 111 nurses who completed the questionnaire (response rate 81%), 90% was convinced that a direct removal was feasible and 78% would recommend it to a family member or friend. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Although an indwelling catheter is routinely placed during a hysterectomy, it is unclear what the best moment is to remove it after an LH specifically. To fully benefit from the advantages associated with this minimally invasive approach, postoperative catheter management, should be, amongst others, optimal and LH-specific. A few studies have demonstrated that the direct removal of urinary catheter after an uncomplicated LH is feasible, but the evidence is limited. What the results of this study add? While waiting for the results of the randomised trials, this present study provides insight into the nationwide catheterisation management after an LH. Despite the lack of consensus on the topic, catheterisation management was quite uniform in the Netherlands: most Dutch hospitals removed the urinary catheter one day after an LH. Yet, this was not in line with the opinion of the surveyed nurses, as the majority would recommend a direct removal. This is interesting as nurses are closely involved in the patients' postoperative care. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Although randomised trials are necessary to determine an optimal catheterisation management, the findings of this present study are valuable if a new urinary catheter regime has to be implemented.
本研究的目的是评估荷兰医院腹腔镜子宫切除术后(LH)的导尿方案,并评估护士对该主题的看法。这一点尤为重要,因为对于LH术后拔除尿管的最佳时机尚无共识。研究成功联系了荷兰所有89家医院,并获取了它们LH术后导尿方案的信息:69家(77.5%)医院报告在LH术后第二天早晨拔除尿管,而9家医院(10.1%)在手术结束时直接拔除。另外11家医院有不同的政策(术后4小时、最长2天)。此外,还要求莱顿大学附属医院妇科工作的所有护士填写一份自行设计的问卷。在完成问卷的111名护士中(回复率81%),90%的护士确信直接拔除尿管是可行的,78%的护士会向家人或朋友推荐这种做法。影响声明关于这个主题已经知道了什么?虽然子宫切除术中常规放置留置尿管,但具体到LH术后何时拔除尿管最佳尚不清楚。为了充分受益于这种微创方法的优势,术后尿管管理应达到最佳且具有LH特异性。一些研究表明,无并发症的LH术后直接拔除尿管是可行的,但证据有限。本研究的结果补充了什么?在等待随机试验结果的同时,本研究提供了LH术后全国范围内导尿管理的相关情况。尽管在这个问题上缺乏共识,但荷兰的导尿管理相当一致:大多数荷兰医院在LH术后一天拔除尿管。然而,这与接受调查的护士的意见不一致,因为大多数护士会推荐直接拔除。这很有意思,因为护士密切参与患者的术后护理。这些发现对临床实践和/或进一步研究有什么影响?虽然需要随机试验来确定最佳导尿管理方案,但如果必须实施新的尿管方案,本研究的结果是有价值的。