Kulkarni Mahesh Suresh, Aroor Monappa Naik, Vijayan Sandeep, Shetty Saurabh, Tripathy Sujit Kumar, Rao Sharath K
Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1594-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
The surgical outcome of floating knee injuries is difficult to predict. The high-velocity nature of the injury, complex fracture pattern and associated soft tissue/visceral injuries may have some impact on the functional outcome. The present study evaluates the variables affecting the clinical and radiological outcomes of floating knee injuries.
The clinical, radiological and functional outcome (Karlstrom and Olegrud criteria) of 89 patients with 90 floating knee injuries were evaluated at the end of one year who were managed in our level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2016. The details of the injury, fracture pattern, management and complications were collected retrospectively from their records.
There were 81 (91.1%) males and 8 (8.9%) females with mean age of 34.34 ± 12.28 years. The mean time for tibia and femur union was 9.52 (±6.6) and 10.5 (±7.37) months. There was significant delay (p < 0.005) in time taken for union in segmental femur fractures (14.3 ± 9.6 months) compared to nonsegmental femur fractures (8.68 ± 5.18 months). Such significant difference in time taken for union was not seen in tibial segmental (10.6 ± 4.62 months) and nonsegmental fractures (9.05 ± 7.27 months). As per the Karlstrom and Olegrud criteria, there were 22 (24.4%) excellent, 26 (28.9%) good, 24 (26.7%) fair and 11 (12.2%) poor outcome. There were 15 patients with malunited tibia, 6 with malunited femur, 10 with limb length discrepancy and 39 with knee stiffness. 28 (33.3%) patients underwent major additional procedures such as bone grafting, re-fixation or bone transport or tendon transfer. It was observed that open tibia fracture, segmental fracture, intra-articular fracture, additional surgical procedures, initial external-fixator (ex-fix) application were significantly associated with development of knee stiffness, limb shortening, malalignment and unsatisfactory (Karlstrom and Olegrud fair to poor) functional outcome.
Open tibial fractures, segmental fractures, intraarticular involvement, additional surgical procedures and initial external fixator application are the poor prognostic indicators of floating knee injuries.
浮动膝损伤的手术结果难以预测。损伤的高速特性、复杂的骨折模式以及相关的软组织/内脏损伤可能会对功能结果产生一定影响。本研究评估了影响浮动膝损伤临床和放射学结果的变量。
对2013年1月至2016年12月在我们一级创伤中心接受治疗的89例90处浮动膝损伤患者在一年结束时的临床、放射学和功能结果(Karlstrom和Olegrud标准)进行了评估。从他们的记录中回顾性收集损伤细节、骨折模式、治疗方法和并发症。
男性81例(91.1%),女性8例(8.9%),平均年龄34.34±12.28岁。胫骨和股骨愈合的平均时间分别为9.52(±6.6)个月和10.5(±7.37)个月。与非节段性股骨骨折(8.68±5.18个月)相比,节段性股骨骨折的愈合时间明显延迟(p<0.005)(14.3±9.6个月)。胫骨节段性骨折(10.6±4.62个月)和非节段性骨折(9.05±7.27个月)的愈合时间没有如此显著差异。根据Karlstrom和Olegrud标准,结果为优的有22例(24.4%),良的有26例(28.9%),可的有24例(26.7%),差的有11例(12.2%)。胫骨畸形愈合15例,股骨畸形愈合6例,肢体长度差异10例,膝关节僵硬39例。28例(33.3%)患者接受了诸如植骨、重新固定或骨搬运或肌腱转移等主要的附加手术。观察到开放性胫骨骨折、节段性骨折、关节内骨折、附加手术、初始外固定器应用与膝关节僵硬、肢体缩短、畸形和不满意(Karlstrom和Olegrud可至差)的功能结果的发生显著相关。
开放性胫骨骨折、节段性骨折、关节内累及、附加手术和初始外固定器应用是浮动膝损伤预后不良的指标。