Macleod Liam C, Turner Robert M, Lopa Samia, Hugar Lee A, Davies Benjamin J, Ben-David Bruce, Chelly Jacques E, Jacobs Bruce L, Nelson Joel B
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;36(8):364.e9-364.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Recent studies suggest that anesthetic technique during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer may affect recurrence or progression. This association has previously been investigated in series that employ epidural analgesia. The objective of this study is to determine the association between the use of a multimodal analgesic approach incorporating paravertebral blocks and risk of biochemical recurrence following open radical prostatectomy.
Using a prospective database of 3,029 men undergoing open radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon, we identified 2,909 men who received no neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and had at least 1 year of follow up. We retrospectively compared patients who received general analgesia with opioid analgesia (1999-2003, n = 662) to those who received general analgesia with multimodal analgesia incorporating paravertebral blocks (2003-2014, n = 2,247). The primary outcome was time to biochemical recurrence. Biochemical recurrence-free interval was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier technique and compared using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression model.
In total, 395 patients (14%) experienced biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy, including 265 (12%) who received multimodal analgesia and 130 (20%) who did not (adjusted P = 0.27). After adjusting for age, race, body mass index, preoperative prostate specific antigen, grade, stage, perineural invasion, margin status, percent of tumor in the gland, and diameter of the dominant nodule, there was no difference in recurrence-free interval between groups (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.73-1.17).
Use of a multimodal analgesic approach incorporating paravertebral blocks is not associated with a reduced risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
近期研究表明,前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术期间的麻醉技术可能会影响复发或进展。此前已在采用硬膜外镇痛的系列研究中对这种关联进行了调查。本研究的目的是确定采用包含椎旁阻滞的多模式镇痛方法与开放性根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险之间的关联。
利用由一名外科医生实施开放性根治性前列腺切除术的3029名男性患者的前瞻性数据库,我们确定了2909名未接受新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗且至少有1年随访期的男性患者。我们回顾性比较了接受阿片类药物镇痛的全身麻醉患者(1999 - 2003年,n = 662)与接受包含椎旁阻滞的多模式镇痛的全身麻醉患者(2003 - 2014年,n = 2247)。主要结局是生化复发时间。采用Kaplan - Meier技术评估无生化复发间隔,并使用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型进行比较。
总共395例患者(14%)在根治性前列腺切除术后出现生化复发,其中265例(12%)接受了多模式镇痛,130例(20%)未接受多模式镇痛(校正P = 0.27)。在对年龄、种族、体重指数、术前前列腺特异性抗原、分级、分期、神经周围侵犯、切缘状态、腺体肿瘤百分比以及主要结节直径进行校正后,两组之间的无复发间隔没有差异(风险比 = 0.92,95%置信区间:0.73 - 1.17)。
采用包含椎旁阻滞的多模式镇痛方法与根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险降低无关。