Hildenbrand Kasee, Richards K Andrew R, Wright Paul M
a Washington State University.
b University of Alabama.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018 Sep;89(3):361-366. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1472735. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Our primary aim was to determine physical educators' current level of understanding of concussion symptoms and response guidelines.
Participants included 404 in-service physical educators (137 male, 266 female, 1 other) recruited through 3 SHAPE America - Society of Health and Physical Educators communication outlets. Participants were asked to complete an online survey. The survey included 8 questions related to previous concussion training, 6 items to measure awareness of concussion policies, 20 items related to concussion symptoms, and 14 items for concussion knowledge. Analyses included descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 (Coaching × Concussion) factorial analyses of variance to examine differences in study variables by coaching status and participants' personal concussion experiences.
Participants reported they did not have any formal role or responsibility related to concussion management, and more than half reported their districts did not require concussion training. Nevertheless, many physical educators were receiving training (n = 291, 72%). Participants who also coached were more aware of concussion policies and systems than were their counterparts, but there were no differences related to concussion facts.
School districts are generally not requiring concussion management training for physical education teachers or giving them specific responsibilities in the management process, yet many physical educators are getting trained. This training often occurs online and may be required for secondary responsibilities such as coaching. Participants reported being aware of concussion policies and procedures but were less likely to agree that this awareness has resulted in changes in how they teach physical education. Participants also knew more about concussion facts than about the legitimacy of symptoms.
我们的主要目的是确定体育教育工作者目前对脑震荡症状和应对指南的理解水平。
参与者包括通过美国健康与体育教育协会(SHAPE America)的3个交流渠道招募的404名在职体育教育工作者(137名男性,266名女性,1名其他)。参与者被要求完成一项在线调查。该调查包括8个与先前脑震荡培训相关的问题、6个用于衡量脑震荡政策知晓度的项目、20个与脑震荡症状相关的项目以及14个关于脑震荡知识的项目。分析包括描述性统计以及2×2(教练身份×脑震荡经历)析因方差分析,以检验按教练身份和参与者个人脑震荡经历划分的研究变量差异。
参与者报告称他们在脑震荡管理方面没有任何正式角色或职责,超过一半的人报告其所在地区不要求进行脑震荡培训。尽管如此,许多体育教育工作者正在接受培训(n = 291,72%)。兼任教练的参与者比未兼任教练的参与者更了解脑震荡政策和体系,但在脑震荡相关事实方面没有差异。
学区通常不要求体育教师接受脑震荡管理培训,也不给他们在管理过程中的特定职责,但许多体育教育工作者正在接受培训。这种培训通常在线进行,可能是作为教练等次要职责的要求。参与者报告称知晓脑震荡政策和程序,但不太可能认同这种知晓导致了他们体育教学方式的改变。参与者对脑震荡相关事实的了解也多于对症状合理性的了解。