Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Sep;69:129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 18.
The dopamine overdose hypothesis has provided an important theoretical framework for understanding cognition in Parkinson's disease. It posits that effects of dopaminergic therapy on cognition in Parkinson's disease depend on baseline dopamine levels in brain regions that support different functions. Although functions performed by more severely dopamine-depleted brain regions improve with medication, those associated with less dopamine deficient areas are actually worsened. It is presumed that medication-related worsening of cognition owes to dopamine overdose. We investigated whether age-related changes in baseline dopamine levels would modulate effects of dopaminergic therapy on reward learning in healthy volunteers. In a double-blind, crossover design, healthy younger and older adults completed a probabilistic reversal learning task after treatment with 100/25 mg of levodopa/carbidopa versus placebo. Older adults learned more poorly than younger adults at baseline, being more likely to shift responses after misleading punishment. Levodopa worsened stimulus-reward learning relative to placebo to the same extent in both groups, irrespective of differences in baseline performance and expected dopamine levels. When order effects were eliminated, levodopa induced response shifts after reward more often than placebo. Our results reveal independent deleterious effects of age group and exogenous dopamine on reward learning, suggesting a more complex scenario than predicted by the dopamine overdose hypothesis.
多巴胺过量假说为理解帕金森病患者的认知提供了重要的理论框架。该假说认为,多巴胺能治疗对帕金森病患者认知的影响取决于支持不同功能的大脑区域的基线多巴胺水平。尽管与多巴胺缺乏更严重的脑区相关的功能随着药物治疗而改善,但与多巴胺缺乏较少的区域相关的功能实际上会恶化。据推测,与药物相关的认知恶化归因于多巴胺过量。我们研究了基线多巴胺水平的年龄相关性变化是否会调节多巴胺能治疗对健康志愿者奖励学习的影响。在一项双盲、交叉设计中,健康的年轻和年长成年人在接受 100/25mg 左旋多巴/卡比多巴与安慰剂治疗后完成了概率反转学习任务。与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人在基线时的学习效果较差,在受到误导的惩罚后更有可能改变反应。左旋多巴相对于安慰剂对两组的刺激-奖励学习都有恶化作用,而与基线表现和预期多巴胺水平的差异无关。当消除了顺序效应后,左旋多巴诱导的奖励后反应比安慰剂更频繁。我们的结果揭示了年龄组和外源性多巴胺对奖励学习的独立有害影响,这表明比多巴胺过量假说所预测的更为复杂的情况。