Rovaris Karla, Queiroz Polyane Mazucatto, Vasconcelos Karla de Faria, Corpas Lívia Dos Santos, Silveira Bernardo Mattos da, Freitas Deborah Queiroz
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Independent researcher, ORPI -Oral Rehabilitation, Physiology and Imaging, Leuven, Belgium.
Braz Dent J. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):150-153. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801385.
X-ray microtomography (microCT) is a nondestructive technique used to assess bone morphometry. For an accurate analysis, it is necessary to segment the bone tissue from the background images, avoiding under- or overestimation of the real bone volume. Thus, segmentation methods for microCT can influence the accuracy of bone morphometry analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare two different image segmentation methods available on microCT software (subjective and objective) regarding to the human bone morphometric analysis. Sixteen samples containing a fixation screws covered by 0.5-1mm of bone were scanned using the SkyScan 1173 scanner. Three examiners segmented the microCT images subjectively and recorded the threshold values. Subsequently, an objective segmentation was also done. The 3D analysis was performed for both images using the values previously determined in CTAn software. Five bone morphometric parameters were calculated (BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp, Conn.Den) and used as dependent variables. ANOVA showed no significant differences between the methods concerning BV/TV (p=0.424), Tb.N (p=0.672), Tb.Th (p=0.183), Tb.Sp (p=0.973) and Conn.Den (p=0.204). Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from satisfactory to excellent (0.55-1 and 0.546-0.991, respectively). Therefore, results obtained with subjective threshorlding were similar to those obtained with objective segmentation. Since objective segmentation does not have human input and it is a truly objective method, it should be the first choice in microCT studies that concern homogeneity and high resolution human bone sample.
X射线显微断层扫描(microCT)是一种用于评估骨形态测量的无损技术。为了进行准确分析,有必要从背景图像中分割出骨组织,避免对真实骨体积的低估或高估。因此,microCT的分割方法会影响骨形态测量分析的准确性。本研究的目的是比较microCT软件上可用的两种不同图像分割方法(主观和客观)在人体骨形态测量分析方面的情况。使用SkyScan 1173扫描仪对16个包含被0.5 - 1毫米骨覆盖的固定螺钉的样本进行扫描。三名检查人员主观分割microCT图像并记录阈值。随后,也进行了客观分割。使用先前在CTAn软件中确定的值对两种图像进行三维分析。计算了五个骨形态测量参数(骨体积分数、骨小梁厚度、骨小梁数量、骨小梁间距、骨连接密度)并用作因变量。方差分析显示,在骨体积分数(p = 0.424)、骨小梁数量(p = 0.672)、骨小梁厚度(p = 0.183)、骨小梁间距(p = 0.973)和骨连接密度(p = 0.204)方面,两种方法之间没有显著差异。观察者内和观察者间的一致性范围从满意到优秀(分别为0.55 - 1和0.546 - 0.991)。因此,主观阈值分割获得的结果与客观分割获得的结果相似。由于客观分割没有人工输入且是一种真正客观的方法,在涉及均匀性和高分辨率人体骨样本的microCT研究中,它应该是首选方法。