Suppr超能文献

康复在老年人急性事件后的作用:来自亚急性护理环境中真实前瞻性研究的见解。

Role of rehabilitation in the elderly after an acute event: insights from a real-life prospective study in the subacute care setting.

机构信息

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

School of Geriatrics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec;54(6):934-938. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05221-8. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Any acute event, either primary or secondary to a chronic disease, is generally followed by some degree of physical impairment. Subacute care (SAC) represents one of the inpatient intermediate care settings aimed at completing recovery and restoring functional capacity. Debate exists on the role of the rehabilitation treatment in the SAC setting.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients managed in two different SAC Units where A) patients undergo an individualized rehabilitation program on top of optimal medical therapy (OMT) B) patients receive OMT only.

DESIGN

Real-life prospective study.

SETTING

SAC units.

POPULATION

Seventy-five chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients transferred after an acute hospitalization.

METHODS

Upon SAC admission, the following scales were obtained: cumulative illness rating scale comorbidity and severity (CIRSC and CIRSS), mini mental state examination (MMSE), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), Barthel Index (BI), the 10-meter walking test (10MWT). Pre-admission BI was also collected based on history. Upon SAC discharge, BI, POMA, and 10MWT were repeated.

RESULTS

Patients (44 in Group A, 31 in Group B) were similar with regard to age, gender, MMSE, clinical complexity, pre-admission BI, admission 10MWT, POMA, and bedrest conditions. Admission BI was lower in Group A. In both groups BI was lower when compared to the respective pre-admission score. Upon discharge, Group A patients were characterized by a higher BI and POMA compared to Group B. Indeed, BI and POMA improved at discharge only in Group A patients. Only this latter group reached the pre-morbid BI. Upon discharge the number of bedrest patients decreased only in Group A. The percentage of patients discharged home was also much higher in Group A, while a greater number of Group B patients were transferred to a rehabilitation ward or were enrolled in an integrated home care assistance program.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life prospective experience, a better outcome is demonstrated in elderly CHF and COPD patients undergoing a rehabilitative approach during their in-hospital SAC stay.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

An individualized rehabilitation program should integrate medical treatment of CHF and BPCO patients in the SAC setting. This approach demonstrates a better cost-effectiveness management of these patients.

摘要

背景

任何急性事件,无论是由慢性疾病引起的原发性还是继发性,通常都会导致一定程度的身体损伤。亚急性护理(SAC)是旨在完成康复和恢复功能能力的住院中间护理设置之一。关于康复治疗在 SAC 环境中的作用存在争议。

目的

本研究的目的是比较在两个不同的 SAC 单元中接受管理的患者的结果,其中 A)患者在接受最佳药物治疗(OMT)的基础上接受个体化康复计划,B)患者仅接受 OMT。

设计

真实前瞻性研究。

设置

SAC 病房。

人群

75 例慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在急性住院后转院。

方法

在 SAC 入院时,获得以下量表:累积疾病评分量表共病和严重程度(CIRSC 和 CIRSS)、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、操作移动能力评估(POMA)、巴氏指数(BI)、10 米步行测试(10MWT)。根据病史还收集了入院前 BI。在 SAC 出院时,重复 BI、POMA 和 10MWT。

结果

患者(A 组 44 例,B 组 31 例)在年龄、性别、MMSE、临床复杂性、入院前 BI、入院 10MWT、POMA 和卧床条件方面相似。A 组入院时 BI 较低。两组的 BI 均低于各自的入院前评分。出院时,A 组患者的 BI 和 POMA 均高于 B 组。事实上,仅在 A 组患者中,BI 和 POMA 在出院时才有所改善。只有后者组达到了原来的 BI。出院时,仅在 A 组中卧床患者的数量减少。出院回家的患者比例在 A 组中也高得多,而 B 组中更多的患者被转移到康复病房或参加综合家庭护理援助计划。

结论

在现实的前瞻性经验中,在住院 SAC 期间接受康复方法的老年 CHF 和 COPD 患者表现出更好的结果。

临床康复影响

在 SAC 环境中,针对 CHF 和 BPCO 患者的个体化康复计划应整合医疗治疗。这种方法在管理这些患者方面显示出更好的成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验