Rios-Zertuche Diego, Zúñiga-Brenes Paola, Palmisano Erin, Hernández Bernardo, Schaefer Alexandra, Johanns Casey K, Gonzalez-Marmol Alvaro, Mokdad Ali H, Iriarte Emma
Salud Mesoamérica Initiative/Inter-American Development Bank, Calle 50, Edificio Tower Financial Center (Towerbank), Piso 23, Apartado postal: 0816-02900 zona 5, Panamá, Panamá.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, School of Medicine, University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Ave., Suite 600, Seattle, WA, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Apr 1;31(3):183-190. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy136.
Present methods to measure standardized, replicable and comparable metrics to measure quality of medical care in low- and middle-income countries.
We constructed quality indicators for maternal, neonatal and child care. To minimize reviewer judgment, we transformed criteria from check-lists into data points and decisions into conditional algorithms. Distinct criteria were established for each facility level and type of care. Indicators were linked to discharge diagnoses. We designed electronic abstraction tools using computer-assisted personal interviewing software.
We present results for data collected in the poorest areas of Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama and the state of Chiapas in Mexico (January-October 2014).
We collected data from 12 662 medical records. Indicators show variations of quality of care between and within countries. Routine interventions, such as quality antenatal care (ANC), immediate neonatal care and postpartum contraception, had low levels of compliance. Records that complied with quality ANC ranged from 68.8% [confidence interval (CI):64.5-72.9] in Costa Rica to 5.7% [CI:4.0-8.0] in Guatemala. Less than 25% of obstetric and neonatal complications were managed according to standards in all countries.
Our study underscores that, with adequate resources and technical expertise, collecting data for quality indicators at scale in low- and middle-income countries is possible. Our indicators offer a comparable, replicable and standardized framework to identify variations on quality of care. The indicators and methods described are highly transferable and could be used to measure quality of care in other countries.
介绍在低收入和中等收入国家衡量医疗服务质量的标准化、可重复且具有可比性的指标的测量方法。
我们构建了孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健的质量指标。为尽量减少评审人员的判断,我们将清单中的标准转化为数据点,并将决策转化为条件算法。针对每个机构级别和护理类型制定了不同的标准。指标与出院诊断相关联。我们使用计算机辅助个人访谈软件设计了电子提取工具。
我们展示了在伯利兹、哥斯达黎加、萨尔瓦多、危地马拉、洪都拉斯、尼加拉瓜、巴拿马以及墨西哥恰帕斯州最贫困地区收集的数据结果(2014年1月至10月)。
我们从12662份医疗记录中收集了数据。指标显示了不同国家之间以及国家内部医疗服务质量的差异。常规干预措施,如高质量的产前护理(ANC)、即时新生儿护理和产后避孕,依从性较低。符合高质量ANC标准的记录比例在哥斯达黎加为68.8%[置信区间(CI):64.5 - 72.9],在危地马拉为5.7%[CI:4.0 - 8.0]。在所有国家,不到25%的产科和新生儿并发症按照标准进行处理。
我们的研究强调,有了足够的资源和技术专长,在低收入和中等收入国家大规模收集质量指标数据是可行的。我们的指标提供了一个可比较、可重复且标准化的框架,以识别医疗服务质量的差异。所描述的指标和方法具有高度的可转移性,可用于衡量其他国家的医疗服务质量。