Suppr超能文献

红细胞和血浆输注循证指南的质量:一项系统评价

Quality of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Transfusion of Red Blood Cells and Plasma: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Pavenski Katerina, Stanworth Simon, Fung Mark, Wood Erica M, Pink Joanne, Murphy Michael F, Hume Heather, Nahirniak Susan, Webert Kathryn E, Tanael Susano, Landry Denise, Shehata Nadine

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

National Health Service (NHS) Blood and Transplant & the Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals & University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.05.004.

Abstract

Many transfusion guidelines are available, but little appraisal of their quality has been undertaken. The quality of guidelines may potentially influence adoption. Our aim was to determine the quality of evidence-based transfusion guidelines (EBG) for red cells and plasma, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument, and assess duplication and consistency of recommendations. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for EBG from 2005 to June 3, 2016. Citations were reviewed for inclusion in duplicate. A guideline was included if it had a specified clinical question, described a systematic search strategy, included critical appraisal of the literature and a description of how recommendations were developed. Four to six physicians used AGREE II to appraise each guideline. Median and scaled scores were calculated, with each item scored on a scale of one to seven, seven representing the highest score. Of 6174 citations, 30 guidelines met inclusion criteria. Twenty six guidelines had recommendations for red cells and 18 included recommendations for plasma use. The median score, the scaled score and the interquartile range of the scaled score were: scope and purpose: median score 5, scaled score 60%, IQR (49-74%); stakeholder involvement 4, 43%, (33-49%); rigor of development 4, 41%, (19-59%); clarity of presentation 5, 69%, (52-81%); applicability 1, 16%, (9-23%); editorial independence 3, 43%, (20-58%). Sixteen guidelines were evaluated to have a scaled domain score of 50% or less. Variations in recommendations were found for the use of hemoglobin triggers for red cell transfusion in patients with acute coronary syndromes and for plasma use for patients with bleeding. Our findings document, limited rigor in guideline development and duplication and inconsistencies in recommendations for the same topic. The process of developing guidelines for red cells and plasma transfusion can be enhanced to improve implementation.

摘要

目前有许多输血指南,但对其质量的评估却很少。指南的质量可能会影响其采用情况。我们的目的是使用研究与评价指南评估工具(AGREE II)来确定红细胞和血浆循证输血指南(EBG)的质量,并评估建议的重复性和一致性。我们系统检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,查找2005年至2016年6月3日期间的循证输血指南。对重复收录的文献进行了审查。如果指南有明确的临床问题、描述了系统的检索策略、包括对文献的批判性评价以及对建议制定过程的描述,则将其纳入。由四至六名医生使用AGREE II对每个指南进行评估。计算中位数和标准化分数,每个项目的评分范围为1至7分,7分代表最高分。在6174篇文献中,有30篇指南符合纳入标准。26篇指南有关于红细胞的建议,18篇包括关于血浆使用的建议。标准化分数的中位数、标准化分数及四分位间距分别为:范围和目的:中位数分数5分,标准化分数60%,四分位间距(49 - 74%);利益相关者参与度4分,43%,(33 - 49%);制定的严谨性4分,41%,(19 - 59%);表述清晰度5分,69%,(52 - 81%);适用性1分,16%,(9 - 23%);编辑独立性3分,43%,(20 - 58%)。16篇指南的标准化领域分数被评估为50%或更低。在急性冠状动脉综合征患者红细胞输注的血红蛋白触发值使用以及出血患者血浆使用方面,发现了建议的差异。我们的研究结果表明,指南制定的严谨性有限,且同一主题的建议存在重复和不一致之处。红细胞和血浆输血指南的制定过程可以得到改进以促进实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验