At the time of the study, Will D. Schupmann was an undergraduate in the Department of History and Sociology of Science at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):1015-1022. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304423. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Schools have long been critical partners for public health authorities in achieving widespread vaccination. In the mid-20th century, however, public schools also served as sites of large-scale experiments on novel vaccines. Through examining the experimental diphtheria, polio, and measles vaccine trials, I explored the implications of using schools in this manner, as well as the continuities and discontinuities among the three cases. Common to all of them was that the use of schools brought decision-making into the public sphere, subjecting parents to social pressures and the influences of school officials and community members. However, the effects of using schools varied as well, as their social and institutional significance interacted differently with the narratives surrounding each disease, the public's changing perception of medicine and science, and society's changing values. These insights show not only the power of public institutions to influence opinions and perceptions, but also the subtle forces that one's authority figures, peers, and community members may bring to a seemingly private decision-making process. These considerations are relevant to health interventions today, such as the complex debate over community consent in global health research. (Am J Public Health. 2018;108:1015-1022. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304423).
学校长期以来一直是公共卫生部门实现广泛疫苗接种的重要合作伙伴。然而,在 20 世纪中叶,公立学校也成为新型疫苗大规模试验的场所。通过考察白喉、脊髓灰质炎和麻疹试验疫苗的实验,我探讨了以这种方式利用学校的意义,以及这三个案例之间的连续性和非连续性。所有这些案例的共同点是,利用学校将决策纳入公共领域,使父母面临社会压力,以及学校官员和社区成员的影响。然而,利用学校的效果也有所不同,因为它们的社会和制度意义与每个疾病的叙述、公众对医学和科学的看法的变化以及社会价值观的变化不同。这些见解不仅表明了公共机构影响意见和看法的力量,还表明了一个人的权威人物、同龄人以及社区成员可能会对看似私人的决策过程带来微妙的影响。这些考虑因素与当今的卫生干预措施有关,例如在全球卫生研究中关于社区同意的复杂辩论。(美国公共卫生杂志。2018;108:1015-1022. )。