• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症靶向治疗的心血管毒性:系统评价概述的方案。

Cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapies for cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e021064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021064.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021064
PMID:29950466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6042572/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of targeted therapies for cancer has contributed to dramatic improvements in patient survival. Nevertheless, several targeted therapies have been associated with 'off-target' adverse effects, based on varying levels of evidence. To date, this evidence has not been systematically synthesised. We will synthesise published systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity associated with targeted cancer therapies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will include systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and observational studies that report on cardiovascular outcomes for individual agents. We will identify systematic reviews by applying predeveloped, standardised search strategies within Embase, Medline and Cochrane Central. Two independent reviewers will identify reviews published up to 31 December 2016 using predefined eligibility criteria. They will resolve ambiguous cases through consensus, arbitrated by a third reviewer if required. The reviewers will extract and report data according to methodological guidelines for overviews provided by the Cochrane Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. They will assess the quality of included reviews by applying the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool. They will judge the quality of evidence in included reviews based on their assessment of bias and incorporation into the interpretation of findings. In synthesising the evidence, we will classify agents based on systematic review evidence of toxicity (sufficient, probable, possible or indeterminate) for specific cardiovascular outcomes (congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction decline, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, thrombosis and hypertension). This will provide clinicians and patients with an accessible synthesis based on robust methodology.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for overviews. We will conduct the study in collaboration with consumer representatives. We will submit results for peer-review publication, and disseminate them through established clinical and consumer networks.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017080014.

摘要

简介

癌症靶向治疗的引入显著提高了患者的生存率。然而,根据不同程度的证据,一些靶向治疗与“脱靶”不良反应相关。迄今为止,这些证据尚未得到系统的综合分析。我们将综合分析已发表的与靶向癌症治疗相关的心血管毒性的系统评价证据。

方法和分析

我们将包括关于个体药物心血管结局的随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价。我们将通过在 Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane Central 中应用预先制定的、标准化的搜索策略来识别系统评价。两名独立的审查员将根据预先设定的纳入标准,确定截至 2016 年 12 月 31 日发表的综述。如有必要,将通过第三方审查员进行仲裁来解决有争议的情况。审查员将根据 Cochrane 协作组织、Joanna Briggs 研究所和系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目提供的概述方法学指南提取和报告数据。他们将通过应用评估多个系统评价工具来评估纳入综述的质量。他们将根据对偏倚的评估和对结果解释的纳入程度来判断纳入综述的证据质量。在综合证据时,我们将根据特定心血管结局(充血性心力衰竭、心肌梗死、缺血性心脏病、左心室射血分数下降、脑血管疾病、肺栓塞、血栓形成和高血压)的毒性(充分、可能、可能或不确定)对药物进行分类基于系统评价证据。这将为临床医生和患者提供基于可靠方法的易于访问的综合分析。

伦理和传播

概述不需要伦理批准。我们将与消费者代表合作开展这项研究。我们将提交同行评审出版物的结果,并通过已建立的临床和消费者网络进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017080014。

相似文献

1
Cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapies for cancer: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.癌症靶向治疗的心血管毒性:系统评价概述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e021064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021064.
2
Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.左乙拉西坦治疗儿童癫痫的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析的伞状评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e029811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029811.
3
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.比较红细胞输注中限制性与宽松血红蛋白阈值下死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析:系统评价概述方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 24;9(8):e029828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029828.
4
Exploring the evidence for the effectiveness of health interventions for COVID-19 targeting migrants: a systematic review protocol.探索针对移民的 COVID-19 健康干预措施有效性的证据:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 22;11(12):e057985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057985.
5
Cardiovascular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.癌症靶向治疗的心血管毒性:系统评价概述
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Aug 24;4(6):pkaa076. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa076. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Cardiac adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis: A protocol for systematic review.PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂在癌症治疗方案中的心脏不良事件:一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案:系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e18701. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018701.
7
Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to reduce unscheduled hospital admissions among adults.减少成人非计划住院干预措施系统评价概述的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 21;5(8):e008269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008269.
8
Preventive strategies of cancer therapeutics-related cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors: a protocol of systematic review.儿童癌症幸存者癌症治疗相关心脏毒性的预防策略:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e065776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065776.
9
Study designs and outcomes used in evaluation studies of hospital-presenting self-harm: protocol for a methodological systematic review.评估医院就诊自伤的研究设计和结局:方法学系统综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 6;11(8):e044993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044993.
10
Safety and efficacy of anti-hyperglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews based on network meta-analysis.基于网络荟萃分析的系统评价综述:2 型糖尿病患者抗高血糖药物的安全性和有效性:方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0282143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282143. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Biophysical Sensors Based on Triboelectric Nanogenerators.基于摩擦电纳米发电机的生物物理传感器。
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;13(4):423. doi: 10.3390/bios13040423.
2
Safety and efficacy of anti-hyperglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews based on network meta-analysis.基于网络荟萃分析的系统评价综述:2 型糖尿病患者抗高血糖药物的安全性和有效性:方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0282143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282143. eCollection 2023.
3
Cardiovascular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.癌症靶向治疗的心血管毒性:系统评价概述
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Aug 24;4(6):pkaa076. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa076. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews.选择和实施综述方法:五个范例综述的启示。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 18;6(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3.
2
Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.评估AMSTAR以评价医疗保健干预措施综述中系统评价的方法学质量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5.
3
Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews.下一代系统评价:前瞻性荟萃分析、个体水平数据、网络分析和综合性述评。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(20):1456-1458. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097621. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist.综述中的偏倚风险:方法学指南和四项清单的范围综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):92-108. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1229. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Cardiovascular Toxic Effects of Targeted Cancer Therapies.靶向癌症治疗的心血管毒性作用
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1457-1467. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1100265.
6
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.冗余、误导性及存在冲突的系统评价和Meta分析的大量产出。
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
7
Vascular Toxicities of Cancer Therapies: The Old and the New--An Evolving Avenue.癌症治疗的血管毒性:新旧情况——一条不断演变的途径
Circulation. 2016 Mar 29;133(13):1272-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018347.
8
Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction and Heart Failure: Part 2: Prevention, Treatment, Guidelines, and Future Directions.癌症治疗相关的心脏功能障碍与心力衰竭:第2部分:预防、治疗、指南及未来方向。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002843. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002843.
9
Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.环境风险因素与帕金森病:一项荟萃分析的概述性综述
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Feb;23:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结:伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.