Mummareddy Nishit, Brett Benjamin L, Yengo-Kahn Aaron M, Solomon Gary S, Zuckerman Scott L
Vanderbilt Sports Concussion Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Psychology, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Sep;30(5):451-457. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000626.
To describe historic baseline session administration practices, to assess the utility of a practice trial (an acclimation trial) before the official balance session, and to examine the within-session reliability of the Sway Balance Mobile Application (SBMA).
Retrospective observational study.
Middle schools, high schools, and colleges across the United States.
More than 17 000 student-athletes were included in the Sway Medical database with 7968 individuals meeting this study's inclusion criteria.
The Sway Medical database included the following subject characteristics for each student-athlete: age, sex, weight, and height.
Balance assessment score generated by the SBMA.
Variable administration practices with significant differences between baseline session averages across methods were found. Individuals who performed an acclimation trial had a significantly higher baseline session average than those who did not. Within-session reliability estimates were in the low to adequate range (r = 0.53-0.78), with higher estimates found for 2 consecutive baseline tests (r = 0.75-0.78).
For maximum clinical utility, a standardized protocol for postural control baseline acquisition is necessary. Acclimation trial should be administered before a baseline session to minimize variability, especially with only 1 to 2 baseline tests. The highest reliability was observed across 2 consecutive baseline tests within the same baseline session. We suggest obtaining baseline balance measurements with an acclimation trial followed by a baseline session with 2 baseline tests. Prospective studies are required for validation.
描述历史基线测试环节的管理实践,评估正式平衡测试前预测试(适应性测试)的效用,并检验摇摆平衡移动应用程序(SBMA)在测试环节内的可靠性。
回顾性观察研究。
美国各地的中学、高中和大学。
超过17000名学生运动员被纳入摇摆医学数据库,其中7968人符合本研究的纳入标准。
摇摆医学数据库包含每名学生运动员的以下受试者特征:年龄、性别、体重和身高。
SBMA生成的平衡评估分数。
发现不同方法的基线测试环节管理实践存在差异,且各方法的基线测试环节平均水平之间存在显著差异。进行了适应性测试的个体的基线测试环节平均水平显著高于未进行适应性测试的个体。测试环节内的可靠性估计值处于低到适当的范围(r = 0.53 - 0.78),连续两次基线测试的估计值更高(r = 0.75 - 0.78)。
为实现最大临床效用,姿势控制基线采集需要标准化方案。应在基线测试前进行适应性测试,以尽量减少变异性,尤其是在只有1至2次基线测试的情况下。在同一基线测试环节中,连续两次基线测试的可靠性最高。我们建议通过适应性测试获取基线平衡测量值,然后进行包含两次基线测试的基线测试环节。需要进行前瞻性研究以进行验证。