Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的语音噪声听力筛查测试对高频听力损失的准确性:自动条件重筛的纳入。

Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Audiology, ENT Department, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Oct;91(7):877-885. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1332-5. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) 'Occupational Earcheck (OEC)' incorporating an automatic conditional rescreening, in an occupationally noise-exposed population. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of age on test accuracy measures, and to assess the test accuracy for different degrees of HFHL.

METHODS

A study was conducted on cross-sectional data of occupational audiometric examinations, including the index test OEC and reference standard pure-tone air conduction audiometry, of 80 noise-exposed workers. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated for the OEC, after automatic conditional rescreening, for a younger and an older age group, and for two degrees of HFHL (HFHL: PTA3,4,6 ≥ 25 dB HL, and HFHL: PTA3,4,6 ≥ 35 dB HL, both for at least one ear).

RESULTS

Test specificity for HFHL after a single test was 63%, and improved to 93% after the automatic conditional rescreen. Test sensitivity for HFHL decreased from 65% to 59%. Test sensitivity and specificity including automatic conditional rescreening for HFHL was 94% and 90%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio for HFHL was 8.4, and for HFHL 9.4. The negative likelihood ratio for HFHL was below 0.1.

CONCLUSIONS

The OEC is an appropriate screening test, especially for HFHL. Normal-hearing workers who obtained a positive test result for the first test for one or two ears, benefit from having an automatic rescreen, resulting in an improvement of the test specificity, and hence prevent unnecessary referral.

摘要

目的

验证基于互联网的高频听力损失(HFHL)听力筛查测试“Occupational Earcheck(OEC)”的准确性,该测试包含自动条件重测,适用于职业性噪声暴露人群。次要目标是评估年龄对测试准确性测量的影响,并评估不同程度 HFHL 的测试准确性。

方法

对职业听力检查的横断面数据进行了一项研究,包括指数测试 OEC 和参考标准纯音空气传导听力测试,涉及 80 名噪声暴露工人。在自动条件重测后,计算了 OEC 的敏感性、特异性和似然比,分为年轻组和老年组,以及两种程度的 HFHL(HFHL:PTA3、4、6≥25 dB HL 和 HFHL:PTA3、4、6≥35 dB HL,均至少一只耳朵)。

结果

单次测试后,HFHL 的测试特异性为 63%,自动条件重测后提高到 93%。HFHL 的测试敏感性从 65%下降到 59%。包括自动条件重测在内,HFHL 的测试敏感性和特异性分别为 94%和 90%。HFHL 的阳性似然比为 8.4,HFHL 的阳性似然比为 9.4。HFHL 的阴性似然比低于 0.1。

结论

OEC 是一种合适的筛查测试,特别是对于 HFHL。对于一只或两只耳朵初次测试结果为阳性的正常听力工人,自动重测可提高测试特异性,从而避免不必要的转诊,这对他们有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验