Suppr超能文献

子宫重量与经腹、腹腔镜和经阴道子宫切除术的并发症。

Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):480.e1-480.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although uterine size has been a previously cited barrier to minimally invasive hysterectomy, experienced gynecologic surgeons have been able to demonstrate that laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy is feasible with increasingly large uteri. By demonstrating that minimally invasive hysterectomy continues to have superior outcomes even with increased uterine weights, opportunity exists to meaningfully decrease morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if there is an association between uterine weight and posthysterectomy complications and if differences in that association exist across vaginal, laparoscopic, and abdominal approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cohort study of prospectively collected quality improvement data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, composed of patient information and 30-day postoperative outcomes from >500 hospitals across the United States and targeted data files, which includes additional data on procedure-specific risk factors and outcomes in >100 of those participating hospitals. We analyzed patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2014 through 2015, identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. We excluded patients who had cancer, surgery by a nongynecology specialty, or missing uterine weight. Patients were compared with respect to 30-day postoperative complications and uterine weight, stratified by surgical approach. Bivariable tests and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 27,167 patients were analyzed. After adjusting for potential confounders, including medical and surgical variables, women with 500-g uteri were >30% more likely to have complications compared to women with uteri ≤100 g (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.54; P < .0001), women with 750-g uteri were nearly 60% as likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.82; P < .0001), and women with uteri ≥1000 g were >80% more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.21; P < .0001). The incidence of 30-day postsurgical complications was nearly double in the abdominal hysterectomy group (15%) compared to the laparoscopic group (8%). Additionally, for each stratum of uterine weight, abdominal hysterectomy had significantly higher odds of any complication compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, even after adjusting for potential demographic, medical, and surgical confounders. For uteri <250 g, abdominal hysterectomy had twice the odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.33), and among women with uteri between 250-500 g, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with an almost 80% increase in odds of any complication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.19). Even among women with uteri >500 g, abdominal hysterectomy was still associated with a >30% increased odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.71).

CONCLUSION

We found that while uterine weight was an independent risk factor for posthysterectomy complications, abdominal hysterectomy had higher odds of any complication, compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy, even for markedly enlarged uteri. Our study suggests that uterine weight alone is not an appropriate indication for abdominal hysterectomy. We also identified that it is safe to perform larger hysterectomies laparoscopically. Patients may benefit from referral to experienced surgeons who are able to offer laparoscopic hysterectomy even for markedly enlarged uteri.

摘要

背景

尽管子宫大小一直是微创子宫切除术的先前引用的障碍,但经验丰富的妇科外科医生已经能够证明,腹腔镜和阴道子宫切除术对于越来越大的子宫是可行的。通过证明即使子宫重量增加,微创子宫切除术仍然具有更好的结果,有机会显著降低与腹部子宫切除术相关的发病率、死亡率和成本。

目的

我们旨在确定子宫重量与子宫切除术后并发症之间是否存在关联,以及这种关联在阴道、腹腔镜和腹部方法之间是否存在差异。

研究设计

我们对来自美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库的前瞻性收集的质量改进数据进行了队列研究,该数据库由美国 500 多家医院的患者信息和 30 天术后结果组成,目标数据文件包括 100 多家参与医院的特定手术风险因素和结果的额外数据。我们分析了 2014 年至 2015 年因良性疾病接受子宫切除术的患者,这些患者通过当前程序术语代码确定。我们排除了患有癌症、非妇科专业手术或缺失子宫重量的患者。根据手术方法比较了患者 30 天术后并发症和子宫重量。使用双变量检验和多变量逻辑回归进行分析。

结果

共分析了 27167 名患者。在调整了包括医疗和手术变量在内的潜在混杂因素后,与子宫重量≤100g 的女性相比,子宫重量为 500g 的女性发生并发症的可能性高 30%以上(调整后的优势比,1.34;95%置信区间,1.17-1.54;P<.0001),子宫重量为 750g 的女性发生并发症的可能性低近 60%(调整后的优势比,1.58;95%置信区间,1.37-1.82;P<.0001),而子宫重量≥1000g 的女性发生并发症的可能性高 80%以上(调整后的优势比,1.85;95%置信区间,1.55-2.21;P<.0001)。与腹腔镜组(8%)相比,腹部子宫切除术组 30 天术后并发症的发生率几乎翻了一番(15%)。此外,对于每个子宫重量分层,与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,腹部子宫切除术发生任何并发症的可能性显著更高,即使在调整了潜在的人口统计学、医学和手术混杂因素后也是如此。对于<250g 的子宫,与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,腹部子宫切除术发生任何并发症的可能性增加了两倍(调整后的优势比,2.05;95%置信区间,1.80-2.33),而对于 250-500g 之间的女性,腹部子宫切除术与任何并发症的可能性增加近 80%(调整后的优势比,1.76;95%置信区间,1.41-2.19)。即使对于>500g 的子宫,与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,腹部子宫切除术发生任何并发症的可能性仍然增加了 30%以上(调整后的优势比,1.35;95%置信区间,1.07-1.71)。

结论

我们发现,虽然子宫重量是子宫切除术后并发症的独立危险因素,但与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,腹部子宫切除术发生任何并发症的可能性更高,即使对于明显增大的子宫也是如此。我们的研究表明,子宫重量本身并不是进行腹部子宫切除术的适当指征。我们还发现,即使对于明显增大的子宫,腹腔镜手术也可以安全进行。对于那些明显增大的子宫,患者可能受益于转介给能够提供腹腔镜子宫切除术的有经验的外科医生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验