Xue Jinyu, Wang Hesheng, Barbee David, Schmidt Matthew, Das Indra J
Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York 10016, USA.
Varian Medical Systems, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA.
J Med Phys. 2018 Apr-Jun;43(2):106-111. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_144_17.
Dosimetric accuracy of a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan is directly related to the beam model, particularly with multileaf collimator characterization. Inappropriate dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value can lead to a suboptimal beam model, with significant failure in patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) of VMAT plans. This study addressed the systematic issue of beam modeling and developed a practical method to determine the optimal DLG value for a beam model. Several complex VMAT plans were selected for the quality assurance analysis using the variable DLG values. The results of three-dimensional (3D) Gamma analysis as a function of the DLG at 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 1%/1 mm criteria were fitted by a polynomial curve. The DLG value corresponding to the maximum Gamma passing rate for each polynomial fitting function was derived, and the average was calculated to be the optimal DLG value for each model. The 3D Gamma analysis was repeated with the optimal DLG value to verify the dosimetric accuracy of each VMAT case by PSQA. Gamma passing rates are seen to vary considerably with the DLG values and different analysis criteria (3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 1%/1 mm) for each case. The optimal DLG derived for each model was 1.16 mm and 1.10 mm, much larger than the measured value (about 0.3 mm). The beam models with the optimal DLG was able to produce an average Gamma passing rate of 97.1% (range, 94.6%- 99.1%) at 3%/3 mm and 93.5% (range, 89.0%- 96.5%) at 2%/2 mm for one beam model, and 97.1% (range, 94.8%- 99.1%) at 3%/3 mm, and 93.3% (range, 88.8%- 96.7%) at 2%/2 mm for another. The overall accuracy of dose calculation for VMAT plans should be optimized with a compromise of varied modulation complexities in a beam model. We have developed a practical method to derive the optimal DLG value for each beam model based on the Gamma passing criterion. This technique should be applicable in general for all beam energies and patient cases.
容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划的剂量学准确性与射束模型直接相关,尤其是在多叶准直器特性方面。不合适的剂量学叶间距(DLG)值可能导致射束模型欠佳,使VMAT计划的患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)出现重大失误。本研究解决了射束建模的系统性问题,并开发了一种实用方法来确定射束模型的最佳DLG值。使用可变的DLG值选择了几个复杂的VMAT计划进行质量保证分析。在3%/3 mm、2%/2 mm和1%/1 mm标准下,将三维(3D)伽马分析结果作为DLG的函数,用多项式曲线进行拟合。得出每个多项式拟合函数对应最大伽马通过率的DLG值,并计算其平均值作为每个模型的最佳DLG值。用最佳DLG值重复进行3D伽马分析,以通过PSQA验证每个VMAT病例的剂量学准确性。对于每个病例,伽马通过率随DLG值和不同分析标准(3%/3 mm、2%/2 mm和1%/1 mm)有很大差异。为每个模型得出的最佳DLG为1.16 mm和1.10 mm,远大于测量值(约0.3 mm)。对于一个射束模型,具有最佳DLG的射束模型在3%/3 mm时平均伽马通过率为97.1%(范围为94.6%-99.1%),在2%/2 mm时为93.5%(范围为89.0%-96.5%);对于另一个射束模型,在3%/3 mm时为97.1%(范围为94.8%-99.1%),在2%/2 mm时为93.3%(范围为88.8%-96.7%)。VMAT计划剂量计算的总体准确性应通过在射束模型中权衡不同的调制复杂性来优化。我们开发了一种基于伽马通过率标准为每个射束模型推导最佳DLG值的实用方法。该技术通常应适用于所有射束能量和患者病例。