Suppr超能文献

考虑通过率和呼吸运动的调强放射治疗剂量验证

IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion.

作者信息

Xie Kai, Sun Hongfei, Lin Tao, Gao Liugang, Sui Jianfeng, Ni Xinye

机构信息

Radiotherapy Department, Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2018 Jul;16(1):963-969. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8724. Epub 2018 May 16.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into three groups: A; B; and C. The average tumor volumes (V) in the A, B and C groups were 635, 402 and 213 cm, respectively. The simulated A values were set at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. The T values were set at 4, 5 and 6 sec. The γ analysis passing rate was calculated under different conditions (dose difference, 3%; distance difference, 3 mm). Compared with the γ analysis passing rate in the A group (A=0, static; T=4, 5, 6 sec), the γ analysis passing rate deviation (A=5 mm) was <3.3%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). With a gradual increase in A value, the passing rate decreased. The deviation between the 3 groups was <2.5% at the same A value (T=4, 5 and 6 sec). A descending trend of passing rate with increased A value was revealed. At the same A and T values, the passing rate decreased with decreased tumor volume. At the same tumor volume, the passing rate decreased when the A value increased. The respiratory cycle was not demonstrated to be associated with the passing rate. Overall, these results suggest that the A value should be controlled in clinical radiotherapy.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨不同肿瘤体积下动态调强放射治疗计划的γ分析通过率与呼吸幅度(A)和周期(T)之间的关联。总共30例肺恶性肿瘤患者被分为三组:A组、B组和C组。A组、B组和C组的平均肿瘤体积(V)分别为635、402和213 cm³。模拟的A值设定为0、5、10、15、20和25 mm。T值设定为4、5和6秒。在不同条件下(剂量差异3%;距离差异3 mm)计算γ分析通过率。与A组(A = 0,静态;T = 4、5、6秒)的γ分析通过率相比,γ分析通过率偏差(A = 5 mm)<3.3%。然而,这种差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着A值逐渐增加,通过率降低。在相同A值(T = 4、5和6秒)时,三组之间的偏差<2.5%。显示出随着A值增加通过率呈下降趋势。在相同的A和T值下,通过率随肿瘤体积减小而降低。在相同肿瘤体积下,当A值增加时通过率降低。未证明呼吸周期与通过率相关。总体而言,这些结果表明在临床放射治疗中应控制A值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d8/6019885/98c5bf32fbc5/ol-16-01-0963-g00.jpg

相似文献

1
IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Jul;16(1):963-969. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8724. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
In aqua vivo EPID dosimetry.
Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):367-77. doi: 10.1118/1.3665709.

本文引用的文献

1
Dosimetric comparison between IMRT and VMAT in irradiation for peripheral and central lung cancer.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Mar;15(3):3735-3745. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7732. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Evaluation of Dose Distribution in Intensity Modulated Radiosurgery for Lung Cancer under Condition of Respiratory Motion.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0163112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163112. eCollection 2016.
3
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 8;17(1):259-271. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899.
4
Sensitivity of 3D Dose Verification to Multileaf Collimator Misalignments in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Spinal Tumor.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Dec;15(6):NP25-NP34. doi: 10.1177/1533034615610251. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
5
Three-dimensional radiochromic film dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy using a spiral water phantom.
J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1153-9. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt059. Epub 2013 May 17.
6
Motion in radiotherapy: photon therapy.
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Dec 7;57(23):R161-91. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/R161.
10
RapidArc quality assurance through MapCHECK.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Jan 5;12(2):3251. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3251.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验