Suppr超能文献

使用透明矫治器和两种不同的固定正畸矫治器治疗后牙根长度的评估。一项初步研究。

Evaluation of root length following treatment with clear aligners and two different fixed orthodontic appliances. A pilot study.

作者信息

Eissa Osama, Carlyle Terry, El-Bialy Tarek

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt.

Clinical Professor, Graduate Orthodontic Program, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2018 Jun 6;7:11. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_120_17. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the root lengths of upper incisors as an indication of the degree of orthodontically-induced apical root resorption following treatment with Smart Track® aligners and compare it with two different fixed orthodontic appliances - regular and Damon brackets - using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised 33 patients with class I malocclusion and 4-6 mm crowding divided in 3 groups; Group I: 11 patients treated with Smart Track® aligners, group II: 11 patients treated with Damon brackets, and group III: 11 patients with regular brackets. Maxillary incisors teeth lengths were assessed using Dolphin imaging software before and after treatment. All data were analyzed using analysis of variance and -test.

RESULTS

All groups showed statistically significant root resorption, 0-1.4 mm for clear aligners, 0.1-2.3 mm for Damon, and 0-2.5 mm for regular brackets group. However, cases treated with fixed appliance in general showed significantly higher resorption than those treated with Smart Track® aligners ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Orthodontically-induced root resorption, as evaluated by root length, is an inevitable drawback with different orthodontic techniques. However, the use of Smart Track® aligners showed less root resorption relative to regular fixed appliances.

摘要

目的

本试点研究的目的是评估使用Smart Track®隐形矫治器治疗后上颌切牙的牙根长度,以此作为正畸诱导根尖吸收程度的指标,并使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)将其与两种不同的固定正畸矫治器——常规矫治器和Damon矫治器——进行比较。

材料与方法

样本包括33例安氏I类错颌且牙列拥挤4 - 6毫米的患者,分为3组;第一组:11例使用Smart Track®隐形矫治器治疗的患者,第二组:11例使用Damon矫治器治疗的患者,第三组:11例使用常规矫治器治疗的患者。治疗前后使用Dolphin影像软件评估上颌切牙的牙长。所有数据采用方差分析和t检验进行分析。

结果

所有组均显示出具有统计学意义的牙根吸收,隐形矫治器组为0 - 1.4毫米,Damon矫治器组为0.1 - 2.3毫米,常规矫治器组为0 - 2.5毫米。然而,总体而言,使用固定矫治器治疗的病例显示出的吸收明显高于使用Smart Track®隐形矫治器治疗的病例(P < 0.05)。

结论

通过牙根长度评估,正畸诱导的牙根吸收是不同正畸技术不可避免的缺点。然而,与常规固定矫治器相比,使用Smart Track®隐形矫治器显示出较少的牙根吸收。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3343/6004740/e9db3d6cdfa6/JOS-7-11-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验