文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Mucosal leishmaniasis: the experience of a Brazilian referral center.

作者信息

Pedras Mariana Junqueira, Carvalho Janaína de Pina, Silva Rosiana Estéfane da, Ramalho Dario Brock, Senna Maria Camilo Ribeiro de, Moreira Hugo Silva Assis, Martinho Lorena Zaine Matos, Rabello Ana, Cota Gláucia

机构信息

Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Saúde Coletiva, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018 May-Jun;51(3):318-323. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0478-2017.


DOI:10.1590/0037-8682-0478-2017
PMID:29972562
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pentavalent antimonials (Sbv) are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), despite their high toxicity and only moderate efficacy. The aim of this study was to report therapeutic responses with different available options for ML. METHODS: This study was based on a review of clinical records of 35 patients (24 men and 11 women) treated between 2009 and 2015. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 63 years, and the median duration of the disease was 24 months. Seventeen patients received Sbv, while nine patients were treated with liposomal amphotericin B (AmB), and another nine patients were treated with fluconazole. Patients treated with AmB received a total median accumulated dose of 2550mg. The mean duration of azole use was 120 days, and the daily dose ranged from 450 to 900mg. At the three-month follow-up visit, the cure rate was 35%, 67%, and 22% for Sbv, AmB, and azole groups, respectively. At the six-month follow-up visit, the cure rates for Sbv, AmB, and azole groups were 71%, 78%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of effective ML treatment alternatives, and based on our observations, fluconazole is not a valid treatment option.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Mucosal leishmaniasis: the experience of a Brazilian referral center.

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018

[2]
Comparative study on liposomal amphotericin B and other therapies in the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis: A 15-year retrospective cohort study.

PLoS One. 2019-6-26

[3]
Liposomal amphotericin B treatment of Old World cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis: A literature review.

Acta Trop. 2018-6

[4]
Efficacy and Safety of Liposomal Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Mucosal Leishmaniasis from the New World: A Retrospective Study.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015-10-19

[5]
[Treatment of the mucosal form of leishmaniasis without response to glucantime, with liposomal amphotericin B].

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1997

[6]
Liposomal amphotericin B in travelers with cutaneous and muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis: Not a panacea.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017-11-20

[7]
Liposomal formulation of amphotericin B for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis in HIV-negative patients.

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014-3

[8]
High continuous antimony therapy in two patients with unresponsive mucosal leishmaniasis.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985-7

[9]
Cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B in hospitalised patients with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

Trop Med Int Health. 2017-12

[10]
Drug regimens for visceral leishmaniasis in Mediterranean countries.

Trop Med Int Health. 2008-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
The cure rate after different treatments for mucosal leishmaniasis in the Americas: A systematic review.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索