• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 至 2015 年,医疗保险计划 D 中十种最昂贵药物的联邦和个人支出。

Federal and Individual Spending on the 10 Costliest Medications in Medicare Part D from 2011 to 2015.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1621-1624. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15443. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.15443
PMID:29972589
Abstract

Access to prescription medications is critical as the U.S. population ages. Escalating drug costs have garnered mounting attention from the public with increasing federal scrutiny. The Medicare Part D program will increasingly be relied upon to support the health of our nation's older people. We reviewed the publically available Medicare Part D usage data from 2011 to 2015 to quantify the cost of the 10 costliest medications for Part D, evaluated the number of beneficiaries treated with these medications, and measured beneficiaries' out-of-pocket costs. We observed over the analysis period, an increase in spending for these medications, a reduction in number of patients that received them, with increased out-of-pocket costs for the patient. In 2015 U.S. dollars, the amount Medicare Part D spent on the 10 costliest medications increased from $21.5 billion in 2011 to $28.4 billion in 2015-a 32% increase. The number of beneficiaries who received 1 of the 10 costliest medications fell from 12,913,003 in 2011 to 8,818,471-a 32% drop, with an average annual decrease of 7.9%. Out of pocket spending by patients that use these medications increased over the study period. For beneficiaries without the low-income subsidy, the average out-of-pocket cost share for 1 of the 10 costliest medications increased from $375 in 2011 to $1,366 in 2015-a 264% increase overall and an average 66% increase per year. Specialty medications are a growing portion of the costliest medications. As medication costs continue to escalate, and specialty medications become more common, the U.S. will be increasingly challenged with devising mechanisms to access sustainable, affordable medications for all older adults.

摘要

获得处方药物对于美国人口老龄化至关重要。不断上涨的药品成本引起了公众越来越多的关注,也受到了联邦政府越来越多的审查。随着 Medicare Part D 计划越来越依赖于支持我国老年人的健康,这一计划将发挥更大的作用。我们回顾了 2011 年至 2015 年 Medicare Part D 公开可用的使用数据,以量化 Medicare Part D 中 10 种最昂贵药物的成本,评估用这些药物治疗的受益人数,并衡量受益人的自付费用。在分析期间,我们观察到这些药物的支出增加,接受这些药物的患者数量减少,而患者的自付费用增加。按 2015 年美元计算,Medicare Part D 在这 10 种最昂贵药物上的支出从 2011 年的 215 亿美元增加到 2015 年的 284 亿美元,增长了 32%。接受 1 种 10 种最昂贵药物之一的受益人数从 2011 年的 12913003 人下降到 2015 年的 8818471 人,下降了 32%,平均每年下降 7.9%。在研究期间,使用这些药物的患者的自付费用增加了。对于没有低收入补贴的受益人来说,1 种 10 种最昂贵药物之一的自付费用从 2011 年的 375 美元增加到 2015 年的 1366 美元,总体增加了 264%,平均每年增加 66%。专科药物是最昂贵药物中增长最快的部分。随着药物成本的不断攀升,以及专科药物变得越来越普遍,美国将越来越需要设计机制,为所有老年人获得可持续、负担得起的药物。

相似文献

1
Federal and Individual Spending on the 10 Costliest Medications in Medicare Part D from 2011 to 2015.2011 至 2015 年,医疗保险计划 D 中十种最昂贵药物的联邦和个人支出。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1621-1624. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15443. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
3
Variation in Prescription Drug Coverage Enrollment Among Vulnerable Beneficiaries With Glaucoma Before and After the Implementation of Medicare Part D.医疗保险D部分实施前后青光眼弱势受益人群中处方药覆盖范围参保情况的变化
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):212-20. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5090.
4
The Impact of Medicare Part D on the Proportion of Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Costs Among Older Adults With Diabetes.医疗保险处方药部分对老年糖尿病患者自付处方药费用比例的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):502-508. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0902. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Effects of Medicare Part D on drug affordability and use: Are seniors with prior high out-of-pocket drug spending affected more?医疗保险处方药部分对药物可负担性和使用的影响:是否有先前高自付药物支出的老年人受到的影响更大?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):90-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.02.004.
6
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Prescription Drug Spending and Health Care Use: 6 Years of Follow-up, 2007-2012.医疗保险处方药部分对处方药支出和医疗保健使用的影响:2007-2012 年 6 年随访结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):5-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.5.
7
Consequences of forgoing prescription drug subsidies among low-income Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.放弃处方药物补贴对患有糖尿病的低收入医疗保险受益人的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13990. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
8
Coverage for hepatitis C drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药计划(Medicare Part D)中丙型肝炎药物的覆盖范围。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(6 Spec No.):SP220-6.
9
Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs for Medicare Beneficiaries With Cardiovascular Risk Factors Under the Inflation Reduction Act.《平价医疗法案下,心血管疾病风险因素的 Medicare 受益人自付药品费用》。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Apr 18;81(15):1491-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Patterns of prescription drug expenditures and medication adherence among medicare part D beneficiaries with and without the low-income supplement.有和没有低收入补贴的医疗保险D部分受益人的处方药支出模式和药物依从性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 20;14:665. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0665-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Pharmacist Collaborative Care within Academic Health Systems.在学术医疗系统中推进药师协作护理。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Oct 11;7(4):142. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7040142.
2
Examining the Pharmacist Labor Supply in the United States: Increasing Medication Use, Aging Society, and Evolution of Pharmacy Practice.审视美国药剂师劳动力供应:用药量增加、社会老龄化与药学实践的演变
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Sep 19;7(3):137. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030137.