Chatzopoulos Georgios S, Wolff Larry F
Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, Division of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cranio. 2020 Jan;38(1):50-57. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2018.1491097. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
To investigate the association between symptoms of temporomandibular disorder and self-reported bruxism with the risk of implant failure.
This retrospective study is based on 2127 records of patients who had 4519 implants placed and restored at the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry. Patient and implant level information were retrieved from each dental record: age, gender, implant location, as well as history of clicking, pain, difficulty opening, difficulty chewing, and clenching or grinding.
A total of 51 implant failures were identified in the sample. This corresponded to a failure rate of 1.1% at the implant level and 1.7% at the patient level. Among all the patient and implant level variables, the binary logistic regression showed that none of them were significantly associated with implant failure ( > 0.05).
The identification of risk indicators for implant loss can foster long-term implant survival, peri-implant health, and ultimately, implant prosthesis survival.
探讨颞下颌关节紊乱症状及自我报告的磨牙症与种植体失败风险之间的关联。
这项回顾性研究基于明尼苏达大学牙科学院2127例患者的记录,这些患者共植入并修复了4519颗种植体。从每份牙科记录中检索患者和种植体水平的信息:年龄、性别、种植体位置,以及弹响、疼痛、张口困难、咀嚼困难和紧咬牙或磨牙的病史。
样本中总共确定了51例种植体失败。这相当于种植体水平的失败率为1.1%,患者水平的失败率为1.7%。在所有患者和种植体水平的变量中,二元逻辑回归显示,它们均与种植体失败无显著关联(P>0.05)。
确定种植体丢失的风险指标有助于提高种植体的长期存留率、种植体周围组织健康状况,并最终提高种植修复体的存留率。