Suppr超能文献

评价三种紊流模型预测二沉池稳态水动力特性的能力。

Evaluation of three turbulence models in predicting the steady state hydrodynamics of a secondary sedimentation tank.

机构信息

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, 5714 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, 5714 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2018 Oct 15;143:445-456. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.067. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Abstract

The secondary sedimentation tank (SST) is a sensitive and complicated process in an activated sludge process. Due to the importance of its performance, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods have been employed to study the underflow hydrodynamics and solids distribution. Unlike most of the previous numerical studies, in the present investigation, the performance of three different types of turbulence models, standard k-ε, RNG k-ε and Realizable k-ε, are evaluated. Firstly, two-dimensional axisymmetric CFD models of two circular SSTs are validated with the field observations. Next, comprehensive comparisons are presented of the model predictions of the key physical quantities, such as the concentration of effluent suspended solids (ESS), and returned activated sludge (RAS), sludge blanket height (SBH), turbulent properties and flow and concentration patterns. A surprising result shows that the prediction of the ESS concentration is not sensitive to the change of turbulence models; while remarkable prediction difference can be observed in the inlet zone and near-field of sludge hopper and SBH. The results suggest that more observations inside the inlet zone are needed to achieve better model calibration and correct application of the turbulence model, which can be crucial to optimizing the geometry of inlet structure and sludge hopper as well as changing return solids concentration for the operation.

摘要

二沉池(SST)是活性污泥工艺中一个敏感而复杂的过程。由于其性能的重要性,计算流体动力学(CFD)方法已被用于研究底流的水动力和固体分布。与大多数先前的数值研究不同,在本研究中,评估了三种不同类型的湍流模型,即标准 k-ε、RNG k-ε 和 Realizable k-ε 的性能。首先,用现场观测结果对两个圆形 SST 的二维轴对称 CFD 模型进行了验证。接下来,对关键物理量的模型预测进行了全面比较,例如出水中悬浮固体(ESS)和回流活性污泥(RAS)的浓度、污泥层高度(SBH)、湍流特性以及流动和浓度模式。一个令人惊讶的结果表明,ESS 浓度的预测对湍流模型的变化不敏感;而在污泥斗和 SBH 的入口区域和近场可以观察到显著的预测差异。结果表明,需要在入口区域内进行更多的观测,以实现更好的模型校准和正确应用湍流模型,这对于优化入口结构和污泥斗的几何形状以及改变回流固体浓度以进行操作至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验