Suppr超能文献

成年人在去腐过程中暴露的深龋和牙髓的处理:芬兰牙医问卷调查研究。

Management of deep carious lesions and pulps exposed during carious tissue removal in adults: a questionnaire study among dentists in Finland.

机构信息

Institute of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, (Mannerheimintie 172), PO Box 41, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Vantaa Health Center, Jönsaksentie 4, 01600, Vantaa, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1271-1280. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2556-1. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To find out which management methods are preferred by dentists in Finland for a deep carious lesion or a pulp exposed during carious tissue removal in adult patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic questionnaire consisting of 25 questions was sent to 1000 randomly sampled dentists in Finland. The response rate was 32%.

RESULTS

Less invasive excavation strategies (stepwise or selective removal) were preferred by 64% for an asymptomatic deep lesion, while 34% chose nonselective removal to hard dentine. In the presence of an asymptomatic pulpal exposure, vital pulp therapy was preferred, as 71% of the respondents chose direct pulp capping (DPC) or partial pulpotomy, compared to root canal treatment (26%). Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium hydroxide-based materials were both chosen by 40% for vital pulp therapy. In the management of a deep carious lesion, less invasive excavation strategies were significantly associated with having clinical guidelines vs. no guidelines at the practice [odds ratio (OR) 3.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.4-9.0]. MTA was favored over other DPC materials significantly more often by those who had attended continuing education courses during the last 3 years (OR 2.8, CI 1.2-6.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Less invasive management strategies have been adopted into clinical practice by the majority of dentists in Finland. There is a need to encourage the use of MTA in the case of a pulpal exposure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study can be utilized in continuing education, to raise awareness of management strategies supported by present scientific evidence.

摘要

目的

了解芬兰牙医在处理成人患者深龋或龋坏组织去除过程中暴露牙髓时,更倾向于采用哪种治疗方法。

材料与方法

向芬兰的 1000 名随机抽取的牙医发送了一份包含 25 个问题的电子问卷,有效回复率为 32%。

结果

64%的牙医对于无症状深龋,更倾向于采用微创去腐策略(逐步或选择性去除),而 34%的牙医选择非选择性去除至硬牙本质。对于无症状牙髓暴露,牙髓保存治疗更受欢迎,71%的受访者选择直接盖髓术(DPC)或部分活髓切断术,而根管治疗(26%)。对于牙髓保存治疗,有 40%的牙医选择使用三氧化矿物聚合体(MTA)和基于氢氧化钙的材料。在深龋的处理中,采用微创去腐策略与在诊所中是否有临床指南显著相关(比值比[OR] 3.5,95%置信区间[CI] 1.4-9.0)。在过去 3 年参加过继续教育课程的牙医,更倾向于选择 MTA 作为 DPC 材料(OR 2.8,95%CI 1.2-6.5)。

结论

微创治疗策略已被芬兰大多数牙医应用于临床实践。有必要鼓励在牙髓暴露的情况下使用 MTA。

临床相关性

本研究结果可用于继续教育,提高对现有科学证据支持的治疗策略的认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验