School of Agriculture and Environment and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA.
New Phytol. 2018 Dec;220(4):1092-1107. doi: 10.1111/nph.15308. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Contents Summary 1092 I. Introduction 1093 II. Investigating activity of AMF in agroecosystems 1093 III. Crop benefit from AMF: agronomic and mycorrhizal literature differ 1094 IV. Flawed methodology leads to benefits of mycorrhizas being overstated 1094 V. Rigorous methodology suggests low colonisation by AMF can sometimes reduce crop yield 1095 VI. Predicting when mycorrhizas matter for crop yield 1096 VII. Crop genotype 1099 VIII. Fungal genotype 1100 IX. Complex interactions between the mycorrhizal fungal and soil microbial communities 1102 X. Phosphorus-efficient agroecosystems 1102 XI. Conclusions 1103 Acknowledgements 1104 References 1104 SUMMARY: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are ubiquitous in agroecosystems and often stated to be critical for crop yield and agroecosystem sustainability. However, should farmers modify management to enhance the abundance and diversity of AMF? We address this question with a focus on field experiments that manipulated colonisation by indigenous AMF and report crop yield, or investigated community structure and diversity of AMF. We find that the literature presents an overly optimistic view of the importance of AMF in crop yield due, in part, to flawed methodology in field experiments. A small body of rigorous research only sometimes reports a positive impact of high colonisation on crop yield, even under phosphorus limitation. We suggest that studies vary due to the interaction of environment and genotype (crop and mycorrhizal fungal). We also find that the literature can be overly pessimistic about the impact of some common agricultural practices on mycorrhizal fungal communities and that interactions between AMF and soil microbes are complex and poorly understood. We provide a template for future field experiments and a list of research priorities, including phosphorus-efficient agroecosystems. However, we conclude that management of AMF by farmers will not be warranted until benefits are demonstrated at the field scale under prescribed agronomic management.
内容摘要 1092 I. 引言 1093 II. 调查 AMF 在农业生态系统中的活动 1093 III. 作物从 AMF 中获益:农艺和菌根文献存在差异 1094 IV. 有缺陷的方法导致菌根的益处被夸大 1094 V. 严格的方法表明,AMF 的低定植有时会降低作物产量 1095 VI. 预测菌根对作物产量的重要性 1096 VII. 作物基因型 1099 VIII. 真菌基因型 1100 IX. 菌根真菌与土壤微生物群落之间的复杂相互作用 1102 X. 高效利用磷的农业生态系统 1102 XI. 结论 1103 致谢 1104 参考文献 1104 摘要:丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)在农业生态系统中普遍存在,通常被认为对作物产量和农业生态系统的可持续性至关重要。然而,农民是否应该改变管理方式来增强 AMF 的丰度和多样性呢?我们以专注于操纵土著 AMF 定植的田间实验为重点,来解决这个问题,并报告作物产量,或调查 AMF 的群落结构和多样性。我们发现,由于田间实验方法有缺陷,文献对 AMF 在作物产量中的重要性呈现出过于乐观的观点。一小部分严格的研究仅在某些情况下报告了高定植对作物产量的积极影响,即使在磷限制下也是如此。我们认为,由于环境和基因型(作物和菌根真菌)的相互作用,研究结果存在差异。我们还发现,关于一些常见农业实践对菌根真菌群落的影响,文献可能过于悲观,并且 AMF 与土壤微生物之间的相互作用复杂且知之甚少。我们为未来的田间实验提供了模板,并列出了研究重点,包括高效利用磷的农业生态系统。然而,我们的结论是,只有在规定的农艺管理下,在田间规模上证明了效益,农民才需要管理 AMF。