Suppr超能文献

I期临床试验中的老年人:VEGF/VEGFR抑制剂I期临床试验中老年人与中年人和青少年及年轻成年人患者参与率和临床获益率的比较分析

Older adults in phase I clinical trials: a comparative analysis of participation and clinical benefit rate among older adults versus middle age and AYA patients on phase I clinical trials with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors.

作者信息

Subbiah Ishwaria M, Tang Chad, Rao Arvind, Falchook Gerald S, Subbiah Vivek, Tsimberidou Apostolia M, Karp Daniel, Kurzrock Razelle, Hong David S

机构信息

Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 22;9(48):28842-28848. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25571.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults aged 65 years and above remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. We hypothesized that older participation in early phase trials with VEGF/VEGFR (VEGF/R) inhibitors was lower than cancer prevalence in this group and lower than other age groups (middle age, adolescent/young adults [AYA]).

RESULTS

Of 1489 patients, 278 were older adults (18%, median age 68.9y), 220 AYA (15%, median age 32.6 y), 991 middle age (67%, median age 53.8 y). Common malignancies included gastrointestinal ( = 438, 29%), gynecologic ( = 234, 16%), and thoracic/head/neck ( = 216, 15%). Median time to treatment failure did not vary significantly between the 3 age-based cohorts (3m in older adults, 3.5 m middle age, 3.3 m AYA). OR of achieving clinical benefit in older adults vs middle age (OR 1.10, p 0.19 [two-tailed], p 0.09 [one-tailed]) and AYA vs middle age (OR 0.85, p 0.31 [proportions -test, two tailed], p 0.15 [one-tailed]) showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults accounted for <20% of participants on phase I clinical trials with VEGF/R inhibitors but those who participated were just as likely to achieve a clinical benefit as AYA and middle age patients. These findings merit further exploration into patient selection for early phase trials.

METHODS

We identified and separated patients treated on VEGF/R-inhibitor-based phase I trials from 12/1/2004-07/31/2013 into 3 age-based cohorts, AYA (15-39y), middle age (40-64 y), older adults (65 y+). We analyzed clinical/treatment characteristics and response outcomes, calculating the odds ratios (OR) of clinical benefit (defined as SD ≥ 6months, PR, CR) for older adults and AYAs versus middle age participants.

摘要

背景

65岁及以上的老年人在癌症临床试验中的代表性仍然不足。我们推测,老年人参与VEGF/VEGFR(VEGF/R)抑制剂早期试验的比例低于该年龄段的癌症患病率,且低于其他年龄组(中年、青少年/青年[AYA])。

结果

在1489名患者中,278名是老年人(18%,中位年龄68.9岁),220名是青少年/青年(15%,中位年龄32.6岁),991名是中年人(67%,中位年龄53.8岁)。常见恶性肿瘤包括胃肠道(438例,29%)、妇科(234例,16%)和胸/头/颈部(216例,15%)。三个年龄组之间治疗失败的中位时间没有显著差异(老年人为3个月,中年人为3.5个月,青少年/青年为3.3个月)。老年人与中年人相比实现临床获益的比值比(OR 1.10,p 0.19[双侧],p 0.09[单侧])以及青少年/青年与中年人相比(OR 0.85,p 0.31[比例检验,双侧],p 0.15[单侧])均无显著差异。

结论

在使用VEGF/R抑制剂的I期临床试验中,老年人占参与者的比例不到20%,但参与试验的老年人与青少年/青年和中年患者实现临床获益的可能性相同。这些发现值得进一步探索早期试验的患者选择。

方法

我们从2004年12月1日至2013年7月31日基于VEGF/R抑制剂的I期试验中识别并分离出患者,分为三个年龄组,青少年/青年(15 - 39岁)、中年(40 - 64岁)、老年人(65岁及以上)。我们分析了临床/治疗特征和反应结果,计算了老年人和青少年/青年与中年参与者相比临床获益(定义为疾病稳定≥6个月、部分缓解、完全缓解)的比值比(OR)。

相似文献

3
Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Adolescent Young Adults: One Institution's Experience.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Aug;16 Suppl:S53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.022.
4
Comparison of survival between adolescent and young adult older patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Dec 15;12(12):1394-1406. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i12.1394.
5
Evaluation of Adolescents' and Young Adults' Attitudes Toward Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Mar;16(3):e280-e289. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00450. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Adolescents and young adults with classical Hodgkin lymphoma in northern Tunisia: insights from an adult single-institutional study.
Cancer Radiother. 2020 Jun;24(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Older Adult Participation in Early-Phase Lung Cancer Clinical Trials, 1998 to 2020.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2025 Jul 3;6(10):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100873. eCollection 2025 Oct.
3
VinCaP: a phase II trial of vinflunine in locally advanced and metastatic squamous carcinoma of the penis.
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jan;126(1):34-41. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01574-9. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Phase 1 Clinical Trials in the Elderly: Enrollment Challenges.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Jul;11(5):494-501. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.5.5. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
5
The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Apr;11(3):369-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Enrollment Trends and Disparity Among Patients With Lung Cancer in National Clinical Trials, 1990 to 2012.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):3992-3999. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.7088. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Outcomes of patients ≥65 years old with advanced cancer treated on phase I trials at MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER.
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;140(1):208-215. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30417. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Health policy: Overcoming cost barriers to clinical trial participation.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;13(6):333-4. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.72.
5
Universal Genomic Testing Needed to Win the War Against Cancer: Genomics IS the Diagnosis.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):719-20. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0078.
6
Antiangiogenic therapy in oncology: current status and future directions.
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):518-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01088-0. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140232. eCollection 2015.
8
Clinical next-generation sequencing reveals aggressive cancer biology in adolescent and young adult patients.
Oncoscience. 2015 Jul 8;2(7):646-58. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.176. eCollection 2015.
9
Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):169-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Risks and benefits with bevacizumab: evidence and clinical implications.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;3(2):59-69. doi: 10.1177/2042098611430109.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验