Suppr超能文献

III 型肩峰骨折的锁定加压钢板、锁骨外侧板和重建钢板内固定:失效载荷和应变分布的生物力学分析。

Osteosynthesis of type III acromial fractures with locking compression plate, lateral clavicular plate, and reconstruction plate: a biomechanical analysis of load to failure and strain distribution.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny imieniem Adama Grucy, Otwock, Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):2093-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acromial stress fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty have been increasingly studied because of potential functional impairment caused by this complication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare different plating techniques for a type III acromial fracture (also referred to as "scapular spine fracture") in a biomechanical setting with special regard to primary stability and modes of failure.

METHODS

Type III acromial fractures were simulated on 19 Sawbones scapulae and plated with either a lateral clavicular plate (LatCP), a locking compression plate (LCP), or a reconstruction plate (RecoP). We performed testing on 5 scapulae for each plate according to a staircase protocol (100 cycles each step): 50 N and 100 N, then increasing 100 N each step up to 800 N or until failure. The last series of mechanical tests included 3-dimensional micro-motion analysis.

RESULTS

The average force needed to cause failure of the osteosynthesis construct was 376 N for the LatCP, 506 N for the LCP, and 360 N for the RecoP. The difference between the LCP and RecoP was significant (P = .047). The average displacements of the acromion were 12.1 mm, 13.4 mm, and 11.7 mm, respectively. The spring constant was not significantly different between the plates. The LatCP showed increased strain medially, whereas the strain on the RecoP was spread more laterally. The LCP presented a balanced strain distribution, spread evenly over the fracture line.

CONCLUSIONS

In a biomechanical setting, the LCP showed superiority over the LatCP and RecoP as stabilization hardware for type III acromial fractures.

摘要

背景

由于这种并发症可能导致功能受损,因此越来越多地研究了反向肩关节置换术后肩峰的应力性骨折。本研究的目的是在生物力学环境中评估和比较三种类型的肩峰骨折(也称为“肩胛颈骨折”)的不同固定技术,特别关注初始稳定性和失效模式。

方法

在 19 个 Sawbones 肩胛骨上模拟了三型肩峰骨折,并分别用锁骨外侧板(LatCP)、锁定加压板(LCP)或重建板(RecoP)进行固定。我们按照阶梯方案对每种钢板进行了 5 个肩胛骨的测试(每步 100 个循环):50N 和 100N,然后每次增加 100N,直到 800N 或直至失效。最后一系列机械测试包括三维微动分析。

结果

导致内固定失败的平均力对于 LatCP 为 376N,对于 LCP 为 506N,对于 RecoP 为 360N。LCP 和 RecoP 之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = .047)。肩峰的平均位移分别为 12.1mm、13.4mm 和 11.7mm。各钢板间的弹簧常数无显著差异。LatCP 显示内侧应变增加,而 RecoP 的应变分布更为广泛。LCP 表现出均衡的应变分布,均匀分布在骨折线上。

结论

在生物力学环境中,LCP 作为三型肩峰骨折的固定硬件,优于 LatCP 和 RecoP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验