Gasparutto Xavier, Jacquelin Eric, Dumas Raphael
LBMC UMR_T9406, IFSTTAR and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Aug;232(8):768-778. doi: 10.1177/0954411918785661. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
The lower limb passive actions representing the actions of all the passive periarticular structures have been shown to have a significant contribution to the power generation and absorption during gait. However, the respective magnitude of its different components was not established, although models of ligament moment were implemented in some musculoskeletal models. These ligament moments have shown to have an influence on the musculo-tendon forces and contact forces but the models used were never specifically evaluated, that is, compared to the passive and net joint moments. Two models of passive joint moments and three models of ligament moments were selected from the literature. Ten subjects (23-29 years old, 79.8 ± 9.5 kg, 1.85 ± 0.06 m) participated in the study. Each subject performed three gait cycles in a gait laboratory to acquire the kinematics and ground reaction forces and to compute the ligament, passive and net moments of the right lower limb joints. The contributions of the passive joint moments to the net joint moments were in accordance with the literature, although time shifts appeared for peaks in the hip and knee powers. Two of the models of ligament moments seemed, in fact, to represent the passive joint moments as their contributions were very similar while the third model of ligament moments seemed to represent only penalty-based joint limits. As a conclusion, this study showed that the models of ligament moments existing in the literature do not seem reliable. This study also demonstrated that the use of non-subject-specific models of the passive joint moments could be a valid approach for healthy subjects.
代表所有被动关节周围结构作用的下肢被动动作已被证明在步态过程中对能量产生和吸收有显著贡献。然而,尽管在一些肌肉骨骼模型中实施了韧带力矩模型,但其不同组成部分的各自大小尚未确定。这些韧带力矩已被证明会影响肌肉肌腱力和接触力,但所使用的模型从未经过专门评估,即与被动和净关节力矩进行比较。从文献中选取了两个被动关节力矩模型和三个韧带力矩模型。十名受试者(年龄在23 - 29岁之间,体重79.8 ± 9.5千克,身高1.85 ± 0.06米)参与了该研究。每位受试者在步态实验室中进行三个步态周期,以获取运动学和地面反作用力,并计算右下肢关节的韧带、被动和净力矩。被动关节力矩对净关节力矩的贡献与文献一致,尽管在髋部和膝部功率峰值处出现了时间偏移。实际上,其中两个韧带力矩模型似乎代表了被动关节力矩,因为它们的贡献非常相似,而第三个韧带力矩模型似乎仅代表基于惩罚的关节极限。总之,本研究表明文献中现有的韧带力矩模型似乎不可靠。本研究还表明,对于健康受试者,使用非个体特异性的被动关节力矩模型可能是一种有效的方法。